Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$323k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2026
7
Organizations funded FY2025
0%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$120,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 8
FY2019 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
1
Total assets, FY2026
$5.9M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 0% of the organizations The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving9$323k22%
FY20257$299k0%
FY20246$293k17%
FY20238$345k63%
FY20228$310k63%
FY20215$304k60%
FY20206$347k17%
FY20196$320k50%
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.0MEducation$219kYouth Development$98kHealth$95kAnimals$75kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($444k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 16 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $810,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetCasa Manana Inc: $700,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetFort Worth Opera Association Inc: $325,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetFort Worth Museum of Science and History: $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHope Farm Inc: $90,116 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmphibian Productions Inc: $71,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetMayfest Inc (Dba Trinity Collaborative Inc): $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSwenson Memorial Museum: $40,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetCristo Rey Fort Worth Catholic High School Inc: $38,553 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCircle Theatre Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetKids Who Care Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTarrant County Medical Society: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThe Fort Worth Public Library Foundation: $17,115 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetThe Hill School of Fort Worth Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCoram Deo Academy: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sid W Richardson FoundationTX28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sid W Richardson Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Virginia Hobbs Charitable Trust Simmons Bank Trustee · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Fifth Avenue Foundation · R4 Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Frances C and William P Smallwood Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 with peer funders

About The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006

How much does The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 give?
The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 reported 9 grants totaling $323,000 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 8 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2025.
What does The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2026, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (81%), Education (9%), Youth Development (4%).
Who are The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2026: Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ($810k), Casa Manana Inc ($700k), Fort Worth Opera Association Inc ($325k).
Does The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sid W Richardson Foundation, Amon G Carter Foundation, Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc.
Where is The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 based?
The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006’s filings →

More from the funding graph