Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Oven Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$6kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$1kReligion$950Environment$600Health$450Food & Nutrition$150Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
1
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWN AND COUNTRY SCHOOL$1,200
PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$300
EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES TULSA$250
THE NORMAN PS FOUNDATION$200
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN OK$200
ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9k · 6 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
24

Total granted

$9k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+4%

Still filing today

33%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Town & Country School Inc
    3× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +31%
  • THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +39%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2025 · $800

Funded once

  • GM
    GILCREASE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH TULSA
    one grant, 2024 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
2
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
3
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
4
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
5
Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To support community efforts to provide a greater supply of affordable housing in tulsa county and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
6
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
7
The Foundation for Tulsa Schools

The Foundation for Tulsa Schools was established to build a stronger community through the support of Tulsa Public Schools.

Education
8
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
9
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
10
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
11
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation

Oklahoma Tennis Foundation positively impacts lives by supporting & funding organizations that promote tennis & education throughout the great State of Oklahoma.

Recreation & Sports
12
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Tulsa; the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Town & Country School Inc: $4,200 · OtherThe Town & Country School IncGILCREASE MUSEUM: $2,500 · OtherGILCREASE MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $550 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN OK: $550 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 · Other+21 more: $2,600 · Other+21 moreTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,250 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBROOK M…OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $1,250 · Public Safety & DisasterThe University of Tulsa: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $100 · EducationTulsa Library Trust: $100 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS: $250 · HealthEmergency Infant Services Inc: $200 · Human Services
Other$11,700Arts & Culture$2,250Public Safety & Disaster$1,250Education$1,200Health$250Human Services$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Town & Country School Inc: $4,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Library Trust: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Town & Country School Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS ↗
  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Library Trust ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · John and Donnie Brock Foundation · Broadhurst Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Coretz Family Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Oven Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Oven Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oven’s filings →

More from the funding graph