Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Oven Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$6kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$1kReligion$950Environment$600Health$450Food & Nutrition$150Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$300
Median grant
1
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWN AND COUNTRY SCHOOL$1,200
PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$300
EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES TULSA$250
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN OK$200
THE NORMAN PS FOUNDATION$200
ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9k · 6 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
24

Total granted

$9k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+4%

Still filing today

33%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Town & Country School Inc
    3× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +31%
  • THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +39%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2025 · $800

Funded once

  • GM
    GILCREASE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH TULSA
    one grant, 2024 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
2
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
3
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

4
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
5
Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To support community efforts to provide a greater supply of affordable housing in tulsa county and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
6
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
7
The Foundation for Tulsa Schools

The Foundation for Tulsa Schools was established to build a stronger community through the support of Tulsa Public Schools.

Education
8
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

9
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
10
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
11
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation

Oklahoma Tennis Foundation positively impacts lives by supporting & funding organizations that promote tennis & education throughout the great State of Oklahoma.

Recreation & Sports
12
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Tulsa and the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Town & Country School Inc — $4,200 · OtherThe Town & Country School IncGILCREASE MUSEUM — $2,500 · OtherGILCREASE MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient — $800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY — $550 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN OK — $550 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $500 · Other+21 more — $2,600 · Other+21 moreTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $2,250 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBROOK M…OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC — $1,250 · Public Safety & DisasterThe University of Tulsa — $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $100 · EducationTulsa Library Trust — $100 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS — $250 · HealthEmergency Infant Services Inc — $200 · Human Services
Other$11,700Arts & Culture$2,250Public Safety & Disaster$1,250Education$1,200Health$250Human Services$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Town & Country School Inc — $4,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Library Trust — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Town & Country School Inc
  • Who funds THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS
  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Tulsa Library Trust

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · John and Donnie Brock Foundation · Broadhurst Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Coretz Family Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Oven Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • The University of Tulsa5% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph