Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$676k
Granted FY2018
20
Grants FY2018
16
Organizations funded FY2018
50%
First-time grantees FY2018
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2018
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$250,000
Organizations funded a year
16 to 26
FY2017 to FY2018
States reached, FY2018
6
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2018, 50% of the organizations The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 26% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201816$665k50%
FY201726$634kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$515kEducation$240kYouth Development$166kRecreation & Sports$155kHuman Services$133kArts & Culture$59kInternational$30kAnimals$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
DC
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 22 grantees

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($443k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $501,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTiger Woods Foundation Inc: $200,080 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetArmand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Global Fight Against AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Nest School: $21,650 over 2y, 12% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of America: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTheatre Forward Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGreater Los Angeles Zoological Association: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInner City Scholarship Fund Inc: $7,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Junior Tennis & Learning of Trenton Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSt Baldrick's Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter Theatre Group of Los Angeles: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAquarium of the Pacific Corporation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVenice Family Clinic: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Academy of Art: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren Mending Hearts Inc: $660 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Children's Rights: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc with peer funders

About The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc

How much does The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc give?
The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc reported 20 grants totaling $676,300 in its FY2018 IRS filing. It funded between 16 and 26 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2018.
What does The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2018, its largest causes are Health (39%), Education (18%), Youth Development (13%).
Who are The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2018: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ($501k), Tiger Woods Foundation Inc ($200k), Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc ($40k).
Does The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2018, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc based?
The Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag Foundation Inc is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Orszag Foundation Inc Fka the Jonathan Orszag’s filings →

More from the funding graph