· Private foundation
The Olseth Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $122k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $502k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $303k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC (WWF) | $100,000 |
| RECHARGE AMERICA INC | $90,000 |
| ST OLAF COLLEGE | $60,000 |
| THE ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS | $53,000 |
| GREATER MANKATO AREA UNITED WAY INC | $46,500 |
| OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL FUND (OREGON WILD) | $35,000 |
| THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
| PATH HOME (FORMERLY PHFS) | $30,000 |
| MANKATO AREA FOUNDATION | $28,000 |
| JUNGLE THEATER | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY | $22,000 |
| OREGON WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC | $20,000 |
| PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC | $20,000 |
| OREGON FOOD BANK INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of The Olseth Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RARECHARGE AMERICA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $505k · revenue +90%
- SOST OLAF COLLEGE6× · 2020–2025 · $360k · revenue +57%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISONone grant, 2024 · $15k
- MCMINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACYgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +96%
- FVFLATHEAD VALLEY SKATEPARK ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.
To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.
Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Environmental Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RECHARGE AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
- Who funds GREATER MANKATO AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds The Advocates For Human Rights ↗
- Who funds Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild ↗
- Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATH HOME ↗
- Who funds OREGON WILDLIFE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JUNGLE THEATER ↗
- Who funds Mankato Area Foundation ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MANKATO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE GENERATION ↗
- Who funds THE HISTORY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds PEAR ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SATURDAY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds FRESH ENERGY ↗
- Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ENGAGEMENT ON SHELTER AND HOUSING ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FREE GEEK ↗
- Who funds Multnomah Arts Center Association ↗
- Who funds STEGER WILDERNESS CENTER FOR INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds THE PLAYWRIGHTS' CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVING VOICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Feeding Our Communities Partners ↗
- Who funds OFF THE BLUE COUCH ↗
- Who funds Minneapolis American Indian Center ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY COMMUNITY HELP ORGANIZATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Xcel Energy Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mankato Area Foundation · Valley News Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Glen a Taylor Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Olseth Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
- Oregon Community Warehouse Inc — 24% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation — 16% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc — 7% of income from government
- Free Geek — 5% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — 2% of income from government
- Pear — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Olseth Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Olseth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.