Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Olive Tree Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$73k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$108kHuman Services$88kArts & Culture$70kFood & Nutrition$68kEducation$64kReligion$45kHousing & Shelter$33kCommunity Improvement$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
P4H Global$8,000
Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater Fdn$7,500
Isaiah 117 House Duval County$7,000
Regional Food Bank of Northeast FL (FNEFL$5,000
Dominican Literacy Center$4,500
Downtown Ecumenical Services Council$4,500
Thornwell Home for Children$4,500
Sponsored By Grace Inc$4,000
Family Promise of Beaufort County$4,000
Mich State Univ Community Music School$4,000
Diaper Bank for Northeast Florida$3,000
Southern California Immigration Project$2,500
Revitalize Arlington Inc$2,500
Mujeres Unidas En Justicia Educacion Y Reforma Inc$2,500
Sam Corley Foundation Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Greenlight Operation: $2k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $6k → 10%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $7k → 18%Diaper Bank for Northeast Florida: $3k → 14%PROJECT 150: $4k → 13%Family Promise of Beaufort County: $4k → 10%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 18%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $4k → 10%Thornwell Home for Children: $5k → 18%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $4k → 10%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 18%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $4k → 10%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 18%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $4k → 10%Thornwell Home for Children: $5k → 18%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $4k → 10%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 18%Sponsored By Grace Inc: $4k → 14%Family Promise of Beaufort County: $3k → 10%THE DISABILITIES FOUNDATION OF BEAUFORT COUNTY INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Olive Tree Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Olive Tree Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$411k · 18 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
38

Total granted

$411k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+30%

Still filing today

61%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PROJECTS FOR HAITI INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +366%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $38k · revenue +98%
  • T
    THORNWELL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • RF
    Regional Food Bank of Northeast FL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +11%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF BEAUFORT
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kid Power Inc

At kid power, youth ignite their confidence and build the skills to thrive academically, strengthen their social-emotional wellness, and advocate for themselves and their communities.

Youth Development
2
Better Together Strengthening Familes Inc

Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…

Human Services
3
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
4
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
5
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
6
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
7
Jeremiah Program

Disrupt the cycle of poverty for single mothers and their children two generations at a time.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Miracle Foundation Inc

A family for every child in our lifetime.

Health
9
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
10
Inspiritus Inc

Inspiritus guides individuals and families on a path from surviving to thriving. we empower those whose lives have been disrupted to discover their strengths and resilience, accompanying them as they grow into vibrant contributors to their…

Religion
11
City of Promise Inc

Our mission is to end generational poverty, and to foster a culture of achievement in which all children in our community graduate from high school, ready for college or career.

Human Services
12
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is KIDZ2LEADERS Inc; the most unlike its peers is BACK2EARTH Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
30/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater Foundation: $30,500 · OtherAlvin Ailey American Dance Theater FoundationDOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES: $26,500 · OtherDOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICESDOMINICAN LITERACY CENTER: $22,500 · OtherDOMINICAN LITERACY CENTERMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $18,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYIsaiah 117 House Duval County: $15,000 · OtherIsaiah 117 House Duval CountyDOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $12,500 · OtherDOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INCRegional Food Bank of Northeast FL: $10,000 · OtherOUR HOUSE INC: $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF BEAUFORT: $8,000 · Other+28 more: $76,500 · Other+28 morePROJECTS FOR HAITI INC: $62,500 · InternationalPROJECTS FOR HAITI INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIER…+4 more: $7,000 · International+4 moreTHORNWELL: $36,500 · Human ServicesTHORNWELLFAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWCOUNTRY: $30,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF…PROJECT 150: $4,000 · Human ServicesSPONSORED BY GRACE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesDIAPER BANK FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA: $3,000 · Human Services+3 more: $5,000 · Human Services+3 moreGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $38,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS C…REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL F…Fundamental Needs Inc: $4,000 · Food & NutritionFundamenta…+2 more: $2,500 · Food & NutritionALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 · Arts & CultureALVIN AIL…ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureARTISTS F…Words Alive: $3,500 · Arts & CultureWords Ali…INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTUTORING CHICAGO: $2,000 · Arts & CultureLiving Arts: $2,000 · Arts & CultureRevitalize Arlington Inc: $16,000 · Community ImprovementCHILDREN OF INMATES INC: $1,800 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $1,500 · Community ImprovementMONTGOMERY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$229,500International$107,500Human Services$82,500Food & Nutrition$49,500Arts & Culture$47,000Community Improvement$19,300Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECTS FOR HAITI INC: $62,500 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNWELL: $36,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWCOUNTRY: $30,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetRevitalize Arlington Inc: $16,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFundamental Needs Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSPONSORED BY GRACE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKIDZ2LEADERS INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budget826 MICHIGAN INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWords Alive: $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDIAPER BANK FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSouthern California Immigration Project: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN SHARING CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCODE GIRLS UNITED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUJERES UNIDAS EN JUSTICIA EDUCACION Y REFFORMA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUTORING CHICAGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DISABILITIES FOUNDATION OF BEAUFORT COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetLiving Arts: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP OF WINTER HAVEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN OF INMATES INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETANCES HEALTH CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENLIGHT OPERATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIONS CHICAGO DREAM INC NFP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNE 10 INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRWANDA SHINES: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDance Alive Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAMEFACE 4 13 TRAINING ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKID PACK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREMEMBER NIGER COALITION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBACK2EARTH INC: $500 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Olive Tree Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Olive Tree Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Mujeres Unidas En Justicia Educacion Y Refforma Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Presbyterian Social Ministries Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Christian Sharing Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Artists for Humanity Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Our House Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Olive Tree Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Olive Tree Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Olive Tree’s filings →

More from the funding graph