Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Oasis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$380kInternational$260kPhilanthropy$110kArts & Culture$102kReligion$48kEnvironment$24kEducation$16kSocial Science$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $190k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TzuChi Foundation$80,000
Lift Up the Vulnerable$60,000
Garden of Hope Inc$50,000
KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$30,000
Queens Botanical Garden Society Inc$10,000
Youth Orchestra CYCNY$10,000
Queens Symphony Orchestra Inc$10,000
Intl Buddhist Progress Society$6,000
Contemporary Arts International$5,000
Vaughn College$5,000
Silver Lining Mssions$5,000
Project Ready NY$5,000
Taiwan Center$4,000
Chinese American Womens Benevolent$3,000
Yongey Buddhist Center$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $38k → 13%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $31k → 13%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 13%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 13%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 13%Taiwan Center: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$920k · 13 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$920k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+5%

Still filing today

46%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +98%
  • KC
    KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $154k · revenue +91%
  • CA
    CONTEMPORARY ARTS INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +336%

Funded once

  • TS
    TAIWAN STUDIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $16k
  • SL
    SLIVER LINING MISSIONS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • QT
    QUEENS TAIWANESE EVANGELICAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean Culture Center of New York

The mission of korean culture center of new york, inc. is to promote and organize korean cultural, arts, educational, and social activities. it aims to establish a venue where all korean americans and other groups can participate in…

Arts & Culture
2
Queens Opera Theatre

To educate the general public of new york on all aspects of opera through opera productions, lectures, classes, camps, social media, newsletters, etc. while emphasizing the need to make opera accessible and affordable to all people, no…

Arts & Culture
3
Sun Ten Museum Inc
—
4
The Asia Society

The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

International
5
New York Chinese Cultural Center Inc

It is dedicated to deepening the understanding and appreciation of chinese culture in the global and local communities. it fulfills its mission by offering professional classes, workshops, and performances while nurturing creative new…

Arts & Culture
6
The New York Korean Performing Arts Center Inc

Our mission is to play an instrumental and educational role in cultivating a sense of cultural pride while fostering healthy, positive intercultural dialogue, for second generation korean-americans. this organization seeks to contribute,…

Arts & Culture
7
New York Chinese Opera Society Inc

The mission of the new york chinese opera society is to catalyze the promotion and artistic development of chinese culture and opera and create opportunities for enjoyment, understanding and appreciation by all people.

Arts & Culture
8
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
9
Creative China Center Inc

Creative china center is a nonprofit arts and cultural organization, dedicated to advancing the understanding and appreciation of chinese contemporary arts and culture to international audiences. it provides cultural exchange platforms for…

Arts & Culture
10
Korean Senior Citizens Association of San Fernando Valley
Recreation & Sports
11
Guanyin Citta of New York Inc

Guanyin Citta provides free workshops, lectures and studying materials on traditional Chinese culture to people in the US with Chinese heritage and people of other heritages that are interested in traditional Chinese culture.

Public Benefit
12
The Korean American Association of Greater New York Inc

Helping south korean immigrants to settle down in the greater new york area as korean-american citizens and promote activities for unity and healthy social relationships.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Queens Botanical Garden Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Queens Symphony Orchestra C-O Queens College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GARDEN OF HOPE INC: $204,000 · Human ServicesGARDEN OF HOPE INCKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC: $153,750 · Human ServicesKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN…+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesTzuChi Foundation: $125,000 · OtherTzuChi FoundationYouth Orchestra CYCNY: $40,000 · OtherYouth Orchestra CYCNYINTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOCIETY: $21,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SO…TAIWAN STUDIES INC: $16,000 · OtherVaughn College: $16,000 · OtherProject Ready NY: $13,000 · OtherChinese American Womens Benevolent: $13,000 · Other+13 more: $56,500 · Other+13 moreLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC: $250,000 · InternationalLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalQUEENS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA C-O QUEENS COLLEGE: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCONTEMPORARY ARTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $24,000 · EnvironmentSILVER LINING MISSIONS: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$361,750Other$300,500International$255,000Arts & Culture$50,000Environment$24,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC: $250,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetGARDEN OF HOPE INC: $204,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC: $153,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetQUEENS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA C-O QUEENS COLLEGE: $25,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetCONTEMPORARY ARTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSILVER LINING MISSIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLINK GLOBAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA C-O QUEENS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CONTEMPORARY ARTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SILVER LINING MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds LINK GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds TAIWAN CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shiush and Hannah Wang Family FoundNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shiush and Hannah Wang Family Found · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Oasis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Oasis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Oasis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Oasis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oasis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph