· Private foundation
The Oasis Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $190k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TzuChi Foundation | $80,000 |
| Lift Up the Vulnerable | $60,000 |
| Garden of Hope Inc | $50,000 |
| KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES | $30,000 |
| Queens Symphony Orchestra Inc | $10,000 |
| Queens Botanical Garden Society Inc | $10,000 |
| Youth Orchestra CYCNY | $10,000 |
| Intl Buddhist Progress Society | $6,000 |
| Silver Lining Mssions | $5,000 |
| Vaughn College | $5,000 |
| Project Ready NY | $5,000 |
| Contemporary Arts International | $5,000 |
| Taiwan Center | $4,000 |
| Chinese American Womens Benevolent | $3,000 |
| Yongey Buddhist Center | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LULIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +98%
- KCKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC5× · 2021–2025 · $154k · revenue +91%
- CACONTEMPORARY ARTS INTERNATIONAL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +336%
Funded once
- TSTAIWAN STUDIES INCone grant, 2023 · $16k
- SLSLIVER LINING MISSIONSone grant, 2021 · $10k
- WTWestchester Taiwanese Churchone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of korean culture center of new york, inc. is to promote and organize korean cultural, arts, educational, and social activities. it aims to establish a venue where all korean americans and other groups can participate in…
To educate the general public of new york on all aspects of opera through opera productions, lectures, classes, camps, social media, newsletters, etc. while emphasizing the need to make opera accessible and affordable to all people, no…
The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.
It is dedicated to deepening the understanding and appreciation of chinese culture in the global and local communities. it fulfills its mission by offering professional classes, workshops, and performances while nurturing creative new…
Our mission is to play an instrumental and educational role in cultivating a sense of cultural pride while fostering healthy, positive intercultural dialogue, for second generation korean-americans. this organization seeks to contribute,…
The mission of the new york chinese opera society is to catalyze the promotion and artistic development of chinese culture and opera and create opportunities for enjoyment, understanding and appreciation by all people.
Creative china center is a nonprofit arts and cultural organization, dedicated to advancing the understanding and appreciation of chinese contemporary arts and culture to international audiences. it provides cultural exchange platforms for…
Guanyin Citta provides free workshops, lectures and studying materials on traditional Chinese culture to people in the US with Chinese heritage and people of other heritages that are interested in traditional Chinese culture.
Helping south korean immigrants to settle down in the greater new york area as korean-american citizens and promote activities for unity and healthy social relationships.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Queens Botanical Garden Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Queens Symphony Orchestra C-O Queens College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC ↗
- Who funds GARDEN OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CONTEMPORARY ARTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds QUEENS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA C-O QUEENS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER LINING MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds LINK GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds TAIWAN CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Shiush and Hannah Wang Family Found · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Oasis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Oasis Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Oasis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.