Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Oak Tree Philanthropic Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$471kReligion$206kEducation$205kHealth$50kHuman Services$39kScience & Tech$38kHousing & Shelter$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PRESS SOCIETY$28,000
HAWKEN SCHOOL STEMM SYMPOSIUM$25,000
MEDWISH INTERNATIONAL$12,000
THE LESOTHO CONNECTION$10,000
JESUIT FATHERS OF DELTA STRADA INC$8,000
GRAMEEN FOUNDATION$5,000
LITHUANIAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS AID$4,000
THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC$4,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$3,000
INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS$3,000
ARC - SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
LITHUANIAN CHILDRENS HOPE$2,000
LITHUANIAN RESEARCH AND STUDIES CENTER$2,000
SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $10k → 8%THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $10k → 16%THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $10k → 8%THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $10k → 8%THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $8k → 8%THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $4k → 8%HOME OF GUIDING HANDS: $2k → 11%HOME OF GUIDING HANDS: $2k → 11%HOME OF GUIDING HANDS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 36 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
6

Total granted

$1.0M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+112%

Still filing today

56%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MEDWISH MEDWORKS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $177k · revenue +63%
  • LC
    LITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PRESS SOCIETY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $140k · revenue +3%
  • GF
    GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • LC
    LITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PRESS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $28k
  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +112%
  • LE
    LITHUANIAN EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
2
Misioneros Del Camino Inc

Care for orphaned, abandoned, malnourished and developmentally disabled children in guatemala, c.a.

International
3
Home for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor

Exclusively charitable, religious and benevolent. The Home is a part of the international Congregation of the Little Sisters of the Poor, which was founded in France in 1839 and serves the elderly in 32 countries.

Religion
4
Little Sisters of the Poor Chicago St Mary's Home

The little sisters of the poor operate st. mary's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in…

—
5
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
6
Lithuanian World Center

To promote and preserve lithuanian culture and heritage.

—
7
Lemonade International Inc

We exist to stand in solidarity with Guatemalan leaders as they break the cycle of poverty, violence, and injustice through education, gang prevention, and community relief for families in the poorest neighborhoods of Guatemala City.

International
8
Little Sisters of the Poor Palatine St Josephs Home for the Elderly

The little sisters of the poor operate st. joseph's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france…

Human Services
9
Loving Hands Childrens Home

Provide loving home environment, continuity of care, and empowerment of displaced and fragile children.

Housing & Shelter
10
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
11
Little Sisters of the Poor Inc

The home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in 1839 & serves the elderly in 31 countries. the home, which provides nursing & residential care for the needy elderly, is…

Housing & Shelter
12
Oak Leyden Developmental Services Inc

To help people with developmental disabilities meet life's challenges and reach their highest potential.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Home of Guiding Hands Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Lithuanian Catholic Press Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAWKEN SCHOOL STEMM SYMPOSIUM: $150,000 · OtherHAWKEN SCHOOL STEMM SYMPOSIUMJESUIT FATHERS OF DELTA STRADA INC: $79,000 · OtherJESUIT FATHERS OF DELTA STRADA INCSALK INSTITUTE WOMEN & SCIENCE: $38,000 · OtherSALK INSTITUTE WOMEN & SCIENCEDAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LA: $29,000 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LALITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PRESS SOCIETY: $28,000 · OtherLITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PRESS SOCIETYCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $21,500 · OtherTHE PREUSS SCHOOL UCSD: $17,000 · Other+20 more: $121,000 · Other+20 moreMEDWISH MEDWORKS: $177,000 · HealthMEDWISH MEDWORKSTacoma Lesotho Connection: $60,000 · HealthTacoma Lesotho Connection+1 more: $6,000 · HealthLITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PRESS SOCIETY: $140,000 · ReligionLITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PR…LITHUANIAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS AID INC: $26,000 · ReligionLITHUANIAN CATHOLIC RE…TERI Inc: $25,500 · ReligionTERI IncST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $21,000 · ReligionST VINCENT DE PAUL VIL…GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $32,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $23,000 · InternationalLITHUANIAN CHILDRENS HOPE: $8,000 · InternationalFOUNDATION FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE CALIFORNIAS: $5,000 · InternationalTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $52,000 · Human ServicesHOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION: $6,000 · Human ServicesLITHUANIAN EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE USA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOPEN DOORS INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$483,500Health$243,000Religion$212,500International$68,000Human Services$58,000Arts & Culture$10,000Youth Development$6,000Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDWISH MEDWORKS: $177,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PRESS SOCIETY: $140,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetTacoma Lesotho Connection: $60,000 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $52,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $32,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LA: $29,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetLITHUANIAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS AID INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTERI Inc: $25,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSeeds of Learning: $13,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetARC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSt Madeleine Sophies Center Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLITHUANIAN EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE USA: $10,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetLITHUANIAN CHILDRENS HOPE: $8,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetOPEN DOORS INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAGNOLIA CLUBHOUSE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE CALIFORNIAS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDWISH MEDWORKS ↗
  • Who funds LITHUANIAN CATHOLIC PRESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Tacoma Lesotho Connection ↗
  • Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LA ↗
  • Who funds LITHUANIAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS AID INC ↗
  • Who funds TERI Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Seeds of Learning ↗
  • Who funds ARC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Madeleine Sophies Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITHUANIAN EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE USA ↗
  • Who funds LITHUANIAN CHILDRENS HOPE ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MAGNOLIA CLUBHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE CALIFORNIAS ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David C Copley FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David C Copley Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Oak Tree Philanthropic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Oak Tree Philanthropic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oak Tree Philanthropic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph