· Private foundation
The O'Grady Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k42 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW MUSEUM | $32,500 |
| WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART | $25,000 |
| NY FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS | $16,000 |
| RIVER VALLEY ARTS CENTER | $15,000 |
| THE FEMINIST INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| THE BRIGID ALLIANCE | $10,800 |
| CREATIVE CAPITAL | $10,667 |
| VOTERIDERS | $10,325 |
| MORGAN LIBRARY & MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM | $7,500 |
| LINCOLN CENTER | $6,500 |
| MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $5,500 |
| METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $5,500 |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NATIONAL THEATER | $5,225 |
| THE PUBLIC THEATER | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY3× · 2020–2022 · $371k · revenue +47%
- WMWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART6× · 2020–2025 · $162k · revenue +69%
- TATHE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC6× · 2020–2025 · $137k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- GIGOVERNORS ISLAND CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +124%
- AIARTISTS IN RESIDENCE INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -16%
- TNTHE NORWALK ART SPACE INCone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.
Producing and developing plays and musicals.
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…
Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…
The studio museum in harlem is a contemporary art museum that focuses on the work of artists of african descent - as well as work that has been inspired and influenced by african culture - past and present; through its exhibitions,…
Apex Art Curatorial Program is a resolutely noncommercial visual art exhibition space which provides curators and artists with a venue dedicated to ideas that are often too provocative or too small in scope for display elsewhere. Apex Art…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Artistic Activism Inc and the most unlike its peers is Akf Foundation for Culture and Environment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MARYMOUNT MANHATTAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds THE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
- Who funds VOTERIDERS ↗
- Who funds RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds TFI DIGITAL ARCHIVE ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE EYEBEAM ATELIER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗
- Who funds AKF FOUNDATION FOR CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE TIME INC ↗
- Who funds The Bronx Museum of the Arts ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ARTISTIC ACTIVISM INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds USF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Elevator Repair Service Theater Inc ↗
- Who funds GOVERNORS ISLAND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NORWALK ART SPACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · Ag Foundation · The Cowles Charitable Trust · The Laurie M Tisch Foundation Inc · Arison Arts Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The O'Grady Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Brattleboro Museum & Art Centerinc — 1% of income from government
- The Norwalk Art Space Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Arc Nature Coast Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.