Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nutting Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$925k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.2MEducation$1.6MEnvironment$245kRecreation & Sports$100kCrime & Legal$58kReligion$40kHealth$25kArts & Culture$21k
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $730k
$25,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BESSEMER TRUST$110,000
BESSEMER TRUST$110,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY$100,000
BETHANY COLLEGE$100,000
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY$60,000
WILLIAMS COLLEGE$50,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WV$50,000
OGLEBAY FOUNDATION$50,000
THE LINSLY SCHOOL$50,000
T ROWE PRICE$50,000
THE HOTCHKISS FUND$25,000
PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$25,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC$25,000
WILLIAMS COLLEGE$20,000
PHILLIPS ACADEMY$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $35k → 8%PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $65k → 10%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $100k → 12%PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $21k → 16%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $60k → 11%THE THACHER SCHOOL: $25k → 10%BESSEMER TRUST: $215k → 17%SAINT ALBANS SCHOOL: $70k → 14%THE HOTCHKISS FUND: $30k → 9%BETHANY COLLEGE: $100k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY: $100k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WV: $50k → 17%MDDC PRESS FOUNDATION: $20k → 19%TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $30k → 10%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $50k → 12%PHILLIPS ACADEMYANDOVER: $17k → 16%BESSEMER TRUST: $215k → 17%SAINT ALBANS SCHOOL: $25k → 14%THE HOTCHKISS FUND: $25k → 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY: $50k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WV: $25k → 17%PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $17k → 10%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $20k → 12%BESSEMER TRUST: $110k → 17%THE LINSLY SCHOOL: $50k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY - WV: $25k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $20k → 12%BESSEMER TRUST: $110k → 17%OGLEBAY FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY - WV: $25k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $15k → 12%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $300k → 17%OGLEBAY FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY - WV: $25k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $15k → 12%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $300k → 17%ST MATTHEW'S CHURCH: $25k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WV: $25k → 17%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $235k → 17%THE LINSLY SCHOOL: $25k → 15%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $235k → 17%WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $25k → 15%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $210k → 17%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $210k → 17%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $200k → 17%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $200k → 17%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $165k → 17%BESSMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND: $165k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 38% of The Nutting Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 16%.

The Nutting Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 19 repeat orgs$273k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$2.4M
$25k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $360k · revenue +16%
  • Williams College
    7× · 2018–2024 · $290k · revenue +36%
  • TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $143k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MP
    MDDC PRESS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
4
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
5
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
11
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Phillips Exeter Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BESSEMER GIVING FUND: $2,220,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BESSEMER GIVING FUNDCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INCWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $360,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUND…Williams College: $290,000 · EducationWilliams CollegePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $143,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harva…TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $143,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMYBETHANY COLLEGE: $100,000 · EducationBETHANY COLLEGETHE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $97,500 · EducationTHE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATEDWEST VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC: $95,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT COLL…WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $90,000 · EducationWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLThe Thacher School Inc: $66,000 · Education+3 more: $34,060 · EducationBESSEMER TRUST: $650,000 · OtherBESSEMER TRUSTSAINT ALBANS SCHOOL: $117,500 · OtherSAINT ALBANS SCHOOLTHE HOTCHKISS FUND: $107,500 · OtherTHE HOTCHKISS FUNDTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN WV: $100,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN W…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY - WV: $85,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY - WVT ROWE PRICE: $50,000 · Other+8 more: $174,000 · Other+8 moreOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $60,000 · EnvironmentMEDIA IMPACT FUNDERS INC: $600 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,370,000Education$1,419,060Other$1,284,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Environment$60,000Arts & Culture$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BESSEMER GIVING FUND: $2,220,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $360,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWilliams College: $290,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $143,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $143,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $97,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC: $95,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $90,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetThe Thacher School Inc: $66,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $60,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $10,560 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA IMPACT FUNDERS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BESSEMER GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Thacher School Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA IMPACT FUNDERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stamp Charitable FundWV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stamp Charitable Fund · W E Stone Foundation · Chris Hess Foundation · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · The Driehorst Family Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Hess Family Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nutting Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nutting Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nutting Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Nutting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nutting’s filings →

More from the funding graph