Skip to content

West Virginia · Private foundation

W E Stone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$82k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
13
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
31%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$834k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 31% of the organizations W E Stone Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 27% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving13$82k0%
FY202413$80k31%
FY202310$68k0%
FY202213$87k15%
FY202112$85k8%
FY202011$72k9%
FY201911$63k0%
FY201811$67k27%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$305kArts & Culture$143kRecreation & Sports$116kPhilanthropy$47kHuman Services$27kHealth$15kYouth Development$14kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of W E Stone Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The University of Charleston Inc$65,00090%
Oglebay Foundation Inc$60,00070%
Oglebay Institute$57,00090%
Wheeling Country Day School$56,00090%
Experience Learning Inc$55,50082%
United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc$42,00061%
Wheeling Symphony Society Inc$40,00090%
The Linsly School Incorporated$37,00090%
Bethany College$22,00030%
The House of the Carpenter Inc$10,50040%
Arts Amplified Inc$10,0002n/a
Youth Services System Inc$8,50030%
NAMI National$6,50020%
Wheeling Jesuit University Inc$5,20010%
The Mountain Institute Inc$4,50010%
Grow Ohio Valley Inc$3,00020%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($195k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget W E Stone Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe University of Charleston Inc: $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOglebay Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetOglebay Institute: $57,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWheeling Country Day School: $56,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetExperience Learning Inc: $55,500 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetUnited Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc: $42,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetWheeling Symphony Society Inc: $40,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetThe Linsly School Incorporated: $37,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBethany College: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe House of the Carpenter Inc: $10,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYouth Services System Inc: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWheeling Jesuit University Inc: $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mountain Institute Inc: $4,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGrow Ohio Valley Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Driehorst Family FoundationWV24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Driehorst Family Foundation · Hess Family Foundation · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Eqt Foundation · Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee · Stamp Charitable Fund · James B Chambers Memorial

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare W E Stone Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to W E Stone Foundation?

Find your warmest path to W E Stone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About W E Stone Foundation

How much does W E Stone Foundation give?
W E Stone Foundation reported 13 grants totaling $82,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does W E Stone Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (45%), Arts & Culture (21%), Recreation & Sports (17%).
Who are W E Stone Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The University of Charleston Inc ($65k), Oglebay Foundation Inc ($60k), Oglebay Institute ($57k).
Does W E Stone Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 31% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does W E Stone Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as W E Stone Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Driehorst Family Foundation, Hess Family Foundation, Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation.
Where is W E Stone Foundation based?
W E Stone Foundation is based in WV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on W E Stone’s filings →

More from the funding graph