Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nomi P Ghez Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$334k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$290k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.0MArts & Culture$378kEnvironment$43kYouth Development$39kHealth$27kRecreation & Sports$22kScience & Tech$17kSocial Science$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $250k+1 grant · $290k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$290,000
THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$16,500
NRDC$6,000
THE ROCKEFEKKER UNIVERSITY$4,550
BALLROOM BASIX USA$4,150
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE FINK MUSEUM$2,500
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$2,500
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SUGERY$1,000
BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION$1,000
EFFROC$1,000
GLYNDEBOURNE AMERICA$600
Individual grant recipient$500
GREENWOOD MUSIC CAMP$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NY LOVES KIDS: $250 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 30 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
26

Total granted

$2.5M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsInternationalEducationAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +76%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUM
    5× · 2017–2023 · $291k · revenue +99%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TS
    THE SAM CULLEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
3
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
4
Amigos Del Museo Del Barrio Inc El Museo Del Barrio

El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.

Arts & Culture
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
7
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
8
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
9
Berggruen Institute
Education
10
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
11
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Academy of Sciences; the most unlike its peers is The Sam Cullen Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
19/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New York University: $1,875,000 · EducationNew York University+1 more: $5,050 · EducationTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $290,800 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUS…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $19,520 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN M…+11 more: $17,795 · Arts & Culture+11 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY: $41,300 · OtherAMERICAN FR…BALLROOM BASIX USA INC: $38,410 · OtherBALLROOM BA…BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $21,020 · OtherBROOKLYN AC…FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF …NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $16,500 · OtherNEW YORK AC…Individual grant recipient: $14,575 · OtherIndividual …HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,700 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · OtherON SITE OPERA INC: $9,000 · OtherCOUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $10,000 · Other+27 more: $48,220 · Other+27 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $43,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $26,500 · InternationalRAZOM INC: $1,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $1,000 · InternationalCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $21,500 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $850 · Recreation & SportsTHE SAM CULLEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $500 · Philanthropy
Education$1,880,050Arts & Culture$328,115Other$253,225Environment$43,000International$28,500Recreation & Sports$22,350Philanthropy$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew York University: $1,875,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $290,800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $43,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBALLROOM BASIX USA INC: $38,410 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $26,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $21,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $21,020 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $19,520 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $16,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAM CULLEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetON SITE OPERA INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $5,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASTERVOICES INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $1,770 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJONAH BOKAER ARTS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRAZOM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHRESH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGreenwood Music Camp Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNY Loves Kids INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLROOM BASIX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds THE SAM CULLEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds ON SITE OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MASTERVOICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSCONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds ORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds JONAH BOKAER ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHARD TUCKER MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nomi P Ghez Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nomi P Ghez Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nomi P Ghez’s filings →

    More from the funding graph