Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Newhall Schleuss Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$131kFood & Nutrition$73kHuman Services$53kEnvironment$38kHealth$38kArts & Culture$33kCivil Rights$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$441k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$20,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
BOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESTOA$5,000
NRDC$5,000
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$5,000
HEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Lutheran Social Service of Minnesot: $15k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESTOA: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESTOA: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESTOA: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESTOA: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 48% of The Newhall Schleuss Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 37%.

The Newhall Schleuss Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 12 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$386k
$20k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +98%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +85%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    5× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • HA
    HEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERVENTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • WV
    Women Ventures
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
4
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
5
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
6
Technoserve Inc

Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.

International
7
Solidaridad North America

We work throughout the whole supply chain to make sustainability the norm and enable farmers and workers to earn a decent income, produce in balance with nature, and shape their own future.

Environment
8
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
9
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
12
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran World Relief Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bountifield International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $58,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCBOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL: $33,000 · InternationalBOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONALLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $28,000 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCGLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN: $40,000 · OtherGLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMENPlanned Parenthood: $38,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodNRDC: $20,000 · OtherNRDCHEARTLAND ALLIANCE: $15,000 · OtherHEARTLAND ALLIANCEIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERVENTIONS: $5,000 · OtherWomen Ventures: $5,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $48,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCI…SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $40,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARV…The Cowles Center: $33,000 · Arts & CultureThe Cowle…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $18,000 · EnvironmentHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights
International$134,000Other$133,000Human Services$48,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Arts & Culture$33,000Environment$18,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $58,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $48,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN: $40,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetBOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL: $33,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetThe Cowles Center: $33,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds BOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds The Cowles Center ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Newhall Schleuss Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Newhall Schleuss Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Newhall Schleuss Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph