Skip to content

· Private foundation

The New Opportunities Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$565k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$815kCivil Rights$355kYouth Development$214kCrime & Legal$185kHousing & Shelter$134kHuman Services$100kEducation$86kHealth$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDER'S PLEDGE USAID ORIGRAMS$200,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$60,000
NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES$50,000
NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER$40,000
CAMP FIRE INLAND NW$40,000
COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION (COED)$35,000
BOLD FUTURES$25,000
HOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE$25,000
NEW INCENTIVES$25,000
WATER FOR SOUTH SUDAN$25,000
FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING - PERU BUILD$20,000
INTERNATIONAL SAMARITANS$10,000
NATIONALITIES COUNCIL OF INDIANA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOLD FUTURES: $50k → 14%EVAC: $10k → 12%BOLD FUTURES: $25k → 14%BOLD FUTURES: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
CA
CO
WV
DE
AZ
NM
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 16 repeat orgs$417k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$1.7M
$197k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
+20%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $220k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalPhilanthropyCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +16%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +7%
  • WF
    Water for South Sudan Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $85k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNLIMITED HEALTH (SCI FOUNDATION)
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • WK
    WAYNE & KIT DANLEY SCHOLARSHIPS NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • CA
    CAMP ARROWHEAD EPISCOPAL MISSION SUPPORT CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
2
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
3
Sanitation and Health Rights in India

SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
6
Equal Access International

To create positive social change for millions of under-served people across the developing world by providing critically needed information and education through innovative media, appropriate technology and direct community engagement.

Health
7
Inclusive Development International

Inclusive Development International supports communities around the world to defend their rights and resources in the face of harmful corporate activities and internationally financed development projects, and we advocate for a more just…

International
8
Second Nile Global Corp

Our commitment to providing accessible clean water extends beyond the boundaries of countries, continents, and cultures. We are driven by a shared belief in the power of technology to transform lives, uplift communities, and create a more…

International
9
Equality Now Inc

To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.

International
10
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
11
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
12
Nijc Nfp

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Evergreen Development Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDER'S PLEDGE USAID ORIGRAMS: $200,000 · OtherFOUNDER'S PLEDGE USAID ORIGRAMSCAMP FIRE INLAND NW: $189,000 · OtherCAMP FIRE INLAND NWNATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER: $140,000 · OtherNATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $114,300 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCSCI FOUNDATION - SCHISTISTOSOMIASIS CONTROL INITIATIVE EDINGBURGH HOUSE: $50,000 · OtherCORTEZ MIDDLE SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherUNLIMITED HEALTH (SCI FOUNDATION): $40,000 · OtherEqualize Health Formerly D-Rev: $60,000 · OtherEqualize Health Formerly D-RevNationalities Council of Indiana: $55,000 · Other+9 more: $157,000 · Other+9 moreNEW INCENTIVES: $205,000 · InternationalNEW INCENTIVESWater for South Sudan Inc: $85,000 · InternationalWater for South S…INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $15,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION: $210,000 · EducationCOOPERATIVE…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN P…HOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 · Civil RightsBOLD FUTURES NM: $100,000 · Human ServicesEVAC INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNeighborhood Ministries Inc: $70,000 · Religion
Other$1,055,300International$315,000Education$210,000Crime & Legal$200,000Civil Rights$120,000Human Services$110,000Religion$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION: $210,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNEW INCENTIVES: $205,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $114,300 over 4y, 39% of budgetHOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetBOLD FUTURES NM: $100,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWater for South Sudan Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNeighborhood Ministries Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEqualize Health Formerly D-Rev: $60,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW INCENTIVES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOLD FUTURES NM ↗
  • Who funds Water for South Sudan Inc ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Equalize Health Formerly D-Rev ↗
  • Who funds Nationalities Council of Indiana ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds EVAC INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The New Opportunities Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The New Opportunities Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The New Opportunities Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The New Opportunities Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Opportunities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph