Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nathan Foundation Inc Ima Co Robert S

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$274k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$400kRecreation & Sports$227kPublic Safety & Disaster$205kHuman Services$175kArts & Culture$154kHousing & Shelter$129kPhilanthropy$61kYouth Development$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $210k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALISBURY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$40,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC$25,000
MID SHORE MEALS TIL MONDAY$20,800
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$20,000
CAMBRIDGE LITTLE LEAGUE$17,500
NATIONAL OUTDOOR FOUNDATION INC$17,100
CHESAPEAKE COLLEGE$15,000
DORCEHSTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC$15,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EASTERN SHORE$10,000
NORTHBAY EDUCATION INC$10,000
FRIENDS OF STANLEY INSTITUTE$10,000
CAMBRIDGE POWER BOAT RACING ASSOCIATION$10,000
ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE$5,000
PARTNERS IN GIVING$5,000
BOND SERVANTS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOND SERVANTS INC: $18k → 15%DORCHESTER COUNTY COMMISSION: $10k → 15%BOND SERVANTS INC: $10k → 15%ALPHA GENESIS CDC: $10k → 15%BOND SERVANTS INC: $9k → 15%BOND SERVANTS INC: $8k → 15%DORCHESTER COUNTY COMMISSION: $8k → 15%DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6k → 15%CARE & SHARE FUND INC: $6k → 15%CARE & SHARE FUND INC: $6k → 15%ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE: $5k → 15%DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%BOND SERVANTS INC: $5k → 15%DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $4k → 15%ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE: $4k → 15%ONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE: $4k → 15%DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 51 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
11

Total granted

$1.7M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

63%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SALISBURY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $284k · revenue +65%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $145k · revenue +166%
  • DS
    DORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $97k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • JG
    JAMES G BUSICK TENNUS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • AS
    A SAFE HARBOR LTD
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -63%
  • AG
    ALPHA GENESIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Market District Volunteer Fire

Provide fire and rescue services in the new market, md area

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Denton Volunteer Fire Company

Community volunteer fire company providing fire protection and fire fighting services, ambulance and rescue service and other emergency services to the town of denton, md.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Dolphin Volunteer Fire Department

Fire protection services for dolphin, va and surrounding communities

—
4
Middle River Volunteer Fire and Rescue Co Inc

The mission of middle river volunteer fire and rescue co., inc. is to prepare for and respond to emergencies, protecting people, property, and the environment of middle river and the surrounding communities by fostering a progressive and…

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Dushore Fire Company # 1

Maintain and operate Volunteer Fire Company and Ambulance Association

—
6
New Manchester Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Fire fighting

—
7
Kilmarnock Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

The organization is a volunteer fire department serving the town of kilmarnock, va and surrounding areas.

—
8
Sackets Harbor Fire Co Inc

Volunteer fire company , provides community firefighters/rescue and ambulance service to the village of sackets harbor and surrounding townships and mutual aid to jefferson county, ny.

—
9
Duncannon Fire Company No 1 Inc

Provide Fire Prevention & Protection Services

—
10
Fort Ann Volunteer Fire Companyinc

Provide fire protection for the residents of the village and town of fort ann.

—
11
Delaware Valley Volunteer Fire Company

Volunteer fire fighting and rescue services.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Middlesex Township Volunteer Fire Company

The mission of the middlesex township volunteer fire company is to provide fire and rescue services to the local community.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is James G Busick Tennus Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/45
Grantees still filing
24/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC: $144,519 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INCCHESAPEAKE COLLEGE: $111,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE COLLEGEYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC: $59,700 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHESAPEAKE INCST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $50,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYCAMBRIDGE POWER BOAT RACING ASSOCIATION INC: $38,000 · OtherMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCJAMES G BUSICK TENNUS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · OtherMIDSHORE MEALS TIL MONDAY INC: $34,300 · Other+32 more: $379,450 · Other+32 moreDORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC: $96,500 · Arts & CultureDORCHESTER SKIPJA…THE NANTICOKE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC: $67,200 · Arts & CultureTHE NANTICOKE HIS…National Outdoor Foundation Inc: $46,300 · Arts & CultureNational Outdoor …THE FRIENDS OF STANLEY INSTITUTE INC: $36,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRIENDS OF ST…DORCHESTER CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureDORCHESTER CENTER…RICHARDSON MARITIME MUSEUM INCORPORATED: $17,000 · Arts & CultureRICHARDSON MARITI…+2 more: $6,850 · Arts & CultureSALISBURY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $284,000 · EducationSALISBURY UNIVERS…SECRETARY VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterRESCUE FIRE CO: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterChurch Creek Volunteer Fire Co Inc: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterELDORADO BROOKVIEW VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterMADISON VOL FIRE CO INC: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterHURLOCK VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE VIENNA VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INCORPORATED: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterEAST NEW MARKET VOLUNTEER FIRE CO EAST NEW MARKET VOLUNTEER FIRE CO: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterBOND SERVANTS INC: $49,500 · Human ServicesDELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $17,900 · Human ServicesDORCHESTER COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesCARE & SHARE FUND INC CARE & SHARE FUND INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesALPHA GENESIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EASTERN SHORE INC: $70,000 · InternationalLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $50,400 · Recreation & Sports
Other$896,969Arts & Culture$289,850Education$284,000Public Safety & Disaster$140,000Human Services$119,900International$70,000Recreation & Sports$50,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSALISBURY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $284,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC: $144,519 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetDORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC: $96,500 over 7y, 15% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EASTERN SHORE INC: $70,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetTHE NANTICOKE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC: $67,200 over 5y, 26% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC: $59,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $50,400 over 4y, 18% of budgetMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOND SERVANTS INC: $49,500 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetNational Outdoor Foundation Inc: $46,300 over 4y, 79% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF STANLEY INSTITUTE INC: $36,000 over 4y, 41% of budgetMIDSHORE MEALS TIL MONDAY INC: $34,300 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetJAMES G BUSICK TENNUS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetDORCHESTER CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetA SAFE HARBOR LTD: $20,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetDELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $17,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECRETARY VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $17,500 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetELLIOTT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INCORPORATED: $17,500 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetRESCUE FIRE CO: $17,500 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetChurch Creek Volunteer Fire Co Inc: $17,500 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetELDORADO BROOKVIEW VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $17,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetMADISON VOL FIRE CO INC: $17,500 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetHURLOCK VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $17,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHE VIENNA VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INCORPORATED: $17,500 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetEAST NEW MARKET VOLUNTEER FIRE CO EAST NEW MARKET VOLUNTEER FIRE CO: $17,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetDORCHESTER COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $17,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRICHARDSON MARITIME MUSEUM INCORPORATED: $17,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF DORCHESTER COUNTY INC: $15,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetDORCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $14,250 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetONE MISSION CAMBRIDGE INC: $13,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCARE & SHARE FUND INC CARE & SHARE FUND INC: $12,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetNORTHBAY EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA GENESIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSNIP TUCK INC: $6,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetCHARACTER COUNTS MID SHORE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetHARRIETS HOUSE: $5,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PINE STREET COMMITTEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY RADIO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN GIVING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMEN OF TOMORROW INC: $3,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDORCHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,850 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SALISBURY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DORCHESTER SKIPJACK COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EASTERN SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NANTICOKE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds MID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOND SERVANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds National Outdoor Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF STANLEY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDSHORE MEALS TIL MONDAY INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES G BUSICK TENNUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DORCHESTER CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds A SAFE HARBOR LTD ↗
  • Who funds DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SECRETARY VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds ELLIOTT VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE FIRE CO ↗
  • Who funds Church Creek Volunteer Fire Co Inc ↗
  • Who funds ELDORADO BROOKVIEW VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON VOL FIRE CO INC ↗
  • Who funds HURLOCK VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE VIENNA VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds EAST NEW MARKET VOLUNTEER FIRE CO EAST NEW MARKET VOLUNTEER FIRE CO ↗
  • Who funds DORCHESTER COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHARDSON MARITIME MUSEUM INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF DORCHESTER COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mid Shore Community Foundation IncMD44.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · Pauline F & W David Robbins Charitable Foundation Trust · Waddell Foundation Inc · Dock Street Foundation · Maryland Humanities Council Inc · The Llandaff Family Trust · Richard and Peggy Greenfield Foundation · Franklin P and Arthur W Perdue Foundation Inc · T & M Mitchell Fdn Dima-Blrk · The Burke & Herbert Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nathan Foundation Inc Ima Co Robert S funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nathan Foundation Inc Ima Co Robert S. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Mace's Lane Community Center: 100% of income from government
  • Dorchester Center for the Arts Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Choptank Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Junior Achievement of the Eastern Shore Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Salisbury University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nathan Foundation Inc Ima Co Robert S’ filings →

More from the funding graph