Loading…
· Private foundation
The Burke & Herbert Bank Foundation
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$78k
Granted FY2024
9
Grants
3
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- BLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION$25,000
- THE RICHMOND KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
- REA OF HOPE FELLOWSHIP HOME INC$10,000
- AARONS PLACE INC$10,000
- DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$5,000
- HIS HOPE MINISTRIES INC$5,000
- ALEXANDRIA TUTORING CONSORTIUM INC$5,000
- BEYOND BOUNDARIES$5,000
- LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE$2,500
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Hearts Place Services Inc
Heart's Place Services, Inc. is a 501(c)3 Charity focused on the homeless in Baltimore City with the main purpose of providing help to homeless children and their families.
Housing & Shelter
2
House of Hope
Assisting and housing females in recovery
—
3
Hope House Inc
Youth Development
4
Rva Hope Center Inc
Organization provides an outreach ministry serving individuals struggling with homelessness, inner city children and families, as well as survivors of sex trafficking.
Religion
5
Furnishhopedc Inc
The organization seeks to help people in need to furnish their homes, helping to break the cycle of poverty.
Public Benefit
6
Holy Rock Outreach Ministeries Inc
The mission of Holy Rock Outreach Ministries, Inc. is to provide a comprehensive social services approach that will promote renewed hope and restoration to a families in crisis.
—
7
Restoration and Hope House
501c3 Charites Organization
Crime & Legal
8
Roanoke Gospel Outreach Center Inc
The center provides religious, educational, and charitable services including distributing clothing, refreshments, toys, gifts and religious instruction to the homeless and low income citizens of the community.
Religion
9
Beth Sholom Home of Eastern Virginia
To develop and pursue programs and services for the benefit of aged and infirm persons.
Human Services
10
Dale County Rescue Mission
The Rescue Missions Purpose is to provide food, housing, transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients. Those served are spiritually ministered.
Human Services
11
Hope House
To serve the community by providing recovery support and a clean and sober living environment for individuals making the transition from addiction and/or incarceration to recovery and community.
Crime & Legal
12
Door of Hope
The organization's mission is to empower families facing homelessness to transform their lives. services provided include transitional housing for families experiencing homelessness and homelessness prevention for families at risk of…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rea of Hope Fellowship Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Delmarva Community Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$12,500Health$10,000Other$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Education$5,000Housing & Shelter$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds REA OF HOPE FELLOWSHIP HOME INC ↗
- Who funds THE RICHMOND KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AARONS PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDRIA TUTORING CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds DELMARVA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HIS HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BEYOND BOUNDARIES ↗
- Who funds LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation The Burke & Herbert Bank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 455240028 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Burke & Herbert Bank Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Burke & Herbert Bank Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines