Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Najork Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$622kEducation$93kInternational$42kYouth Development$38kSocial Science$26kRecreation & Sports$25kHuman Services$25kHealth$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$427k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Samaritan's Purse$20,000
Embark Ministries$18,000
Southern Methodist University$10,000
Bee World$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
East West Ministries$6,000
CRU - Campus Crusade for Christ$5,000
Alice Cooper Solid Rock Foundation$5,000
Austin Street Center$2,000
Aging Mind Foundation$2,000
Armstrong Elementary School$1,200
American Cancer Society$1,000
Dec My Room$1,000
Assistance League of Dallas$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 16%Family Intercultural Resource Ctr: $500 → 9%Men of Nehemiah: $11k → 14%Community Homes for Adults Inc: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CO
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of The Najork Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 59%.

The Najork Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$833k · 25 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
17

Total granted

$833k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+46%

Still filing today

36%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EMBARK MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $151k · revenue +93%
  • Southern Methodist University
    4× · 2019–2025 · $54k · revenue +37%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF REVERCHON PARK
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -98% · 97% of their budget
  • MO
    MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +12%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
4
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
5
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
6
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
7
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
8
Life Network

Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…

Health
9
Financial Planning Ministry

Financial planning ministry, inc. (fpm) is a not-for-profit organization devoted to assisting in the performance of the functions of christian churches by serving their financial needs.

Health
10
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
11
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Solid Rock Foundation Co Rosamond Stanton. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

High Pointe Baptist Church: $97,500 · OtherHigh Pointe Baptist ChurchPARK CITIES PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $74,000 · OtherPARK CITIES PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $60,025 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCIndividual grant recipient: $51,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSMU Cox School of Business: $26,000 · OtherSMU Cox School of BusinessNEXT Worldwide Inc: $23,000 · OtherNEXT Worldwide IncAlice Cooper Solid Rock Foundation: $15,000 · Other+23 more: $74,440 · Other+23 moreEMBARK MINISTRIES INC: $151,000 · ReligionEMBARK MINISTRIES INCEast-West Ministries International: $80,000 · ReligionEast-West Ministries InternationalBiblical Education By Extension Inc: $66,000 · ReligionBiblical Education By Extension IncSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSESouthern Methodist University: $54,300 · EducationSouthern …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationSTEPHEN S…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF REVERCHON PARK: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSolid Rock Foundation Inc: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentDec My Room Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesSUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $500 · Human ServicesSOLID ROCK FOUNDATION CO ROSAMOND STANTON: $13,000 · Philanthropy
Other$421,165Religion$337,000Education$80,300Recreation & Sports$25,000Youth Development$25,000Human Services$13,500Philanthropy$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMBARK MINISTRIES INC: $151,000 over 9y, 9.6% of budgetEast-West Ministries International: $80,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBiblical Education By Extension Inc: $66,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $54,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF REVERCHON PARK: $25,000 over 1y, 97% of budgetNEXT Worldwide Inc: $23,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSolid Rock Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOLID ROCK FOUNDATION CO ROSAMOND STANTON: $13,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDec My Room Inc: $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS LIFE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMBARK MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds Biblical Education By Extension Inc ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF REVERCHON PARK ↗
  • Who funds NEXT Worldwide Inc ↗
  • Who funds Solid Rock Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOLID ROCK FOUNDATION CO ROSAMOND STANTON ↗
  • Who funds MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Dec My Room Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX19.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Independent Charitable Gift Fund · Rowling Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Dallas Seminary Foundation · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Najork Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Najork Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Najork Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph