· Private foundation
The Nabit Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $155k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $104k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GILMAN SCHOOL | $53,792 |
| REBUILD METRO | $50,000 |
| THE CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER | $40,000 |
| FOXCROFT SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| HELPING UP MISSION | $25,000 |
| SWEET BRIAR COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| HEAVEN ON EARTH NOW INC | $20,000 |
| BALTIMORE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS | $20,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH | $5,000 |
| HIPPODROME FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| CALVERT SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN | $2,000 |
| ST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $2,000 |
| THE WALTERS ART MUSEUM | $1,000 |
| ASPCA | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH8× · 2017–2025 · $312k · revenue +44%
- CSCALVERT SCHOOL INCORPORATED6× · 2019–2025 · $167k · revenue +34%
- GSGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED4× · 2022–2025 · $129k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- TGTHE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $86k · revenue +52% · 85% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDone grant, 2017 · $45k
- UOUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Incone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation's (CBF) mission, simply stated, is to Save the Bay. See Schedule O for Continuation (page 48)
The health and environmental sciences institute (hesi) is a nonprofit institution whose mission is to engage scientists from academia, government, industry, nonprofit, and other research institutions to identify and resolve global health…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
Bios's mission is to seek and share fundamental knowledge of the oceans through state-of-the-art scientific research, world-class field expeditions, and comprehensive educational experiences.
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
The cfa society baltimore, inc. was founded in 1948. the cfa society baltimore, inc. was established to provide the financial community with information and knowledge, while advocating ethical conduct with regard to investments and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chesapeake Bay Trust and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
- Who funds CALVERT SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds GILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE JEMICY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HEAVEN ON EARTH NOW INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILD METRO INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM INC ↗
- Who funds HIPPODROME FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BALTIMORE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Foxcroft School ↗
- Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds B&O RAILROAD MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL OPERATIONS GROUP UKRAINE AID INC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds LOVE & CORNBREAD ↗
- Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE PIKE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS FOR LEARNING MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds ULMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE SQUASHWISE INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Mary Jean and Oliver Travers Foundation Inc · Middendorf Foundation Inc · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The Thomas B and Elizabeth M Sheridan Foundation Inc · Linehan Family Foundation Inc · Dicarlo Plank Foundation · Dr Frank C Marino Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Nabit Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chesapeake Bay Trust — 100% of income from government
- Bethany Beach Volunteer Fire Co in Station 70 — 36% of income from government
- Baltimore Squashwise Inc — 23% of income from government
- Chesapeake Shakespeare Company — 16% of income from government
- B&o Railroad Museum Inc — 7% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
- Hippodrome Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- Mcdonogh School Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Nabit Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Nabit Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.