Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mylan Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$3.0MEducation$2.9MRecreation & Sports$2.3MPhilanthropy$1.1MInternational$1.0MHuman Services$887kPublic Safety & Disaster$700kFood & Nutrition$300kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $167k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$333,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mylan Park Foundation Inc$333,000
Mylan Park Foundation Inc$167,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $837k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $70k → 9%HEKIMA PLACE INC: $370k → 11%GOLDEN GIRL INC: $25k → 18%SAFE HORIZON INC: $25k → 17%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC: $25k → 15%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION INC: $25k → 12%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 12%OPERATION WELCOME HOME: $10k → 19%HEKIMA PLACE INC: $32k → 11%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $100k → 19%CHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 11%WOMENS CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PGH: $30k → 11%CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
SD
PA
CA
KY
WV
VA
DC
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Mylan Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Mylan Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 22 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
68

Total granted

$6.1M
$5.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +481%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $650k · revenue +11%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $500k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CH
    CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue +27%
  • TS
    THE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +21%
  • RM
    RECONNECTING MCDOWELL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
3
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
4
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
9
Waynesboro Hospital

Waynesboro hospital is a regional nonprofit healthcare organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
10
The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology

The mission of the wistar institute is to marshal the talents of outstanding scientists through a highly enabled culture of biomedical collaboration and innovation in order to solve some of the world's most challenging and important…

Health
11
Wesley Spectrum Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care .

Human Services
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Caring Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Addiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Lgbtq+ Community SupportDevelopmental Disabilities …Domestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportMilitary Veterans SupportLocal History MuseumsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersFood Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/86
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,479

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/85
Grantees still filing
61/85
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC — $2,250,000 · EducationMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $705,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $650,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHRECONNECTING MCDOWELL INC — $250,000 · EducationSEWICKLEY ACADEMY — $250,000 · EducationSHADY SIDE ACADEMY — $250,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $200,000 · Education+8 more — $565,000 · Education+8 moreCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INC — $500,000 · HealthCABELL HUNTINGTON HOS…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $500,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL …Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $300,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital L…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $165,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL O…THE PATIENT HELPLINE FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · HealthTHE PATIENT HELPLINE …A CALL TO CARE INC — $140,000 · HealthA CALL TO CARE INCUPMC Washington — $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN AUTOIMMUNE RELATED DISEASES ASSOCIATION — $100,000 · HealthDIABETES LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC — $100,000 · Health+10 more — $401,000 · Health+10 moreYOUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WV INC — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyYOUR COMMU…NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $80,000 · Philanthropy+4 moreJames R Jordan Foundation International — $500,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $200,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $100,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · InternationalBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION — $100,000 · InternationalUPMC — $200,000 · OtherUPMCCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES Living Proof C — $200,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSP…BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · OtherBLUECHECK CHARI…HEALTHY START INC — $100,000 · OtherHEALTHY START I…WEST VIRGINIA BROADCASTING FOUNDATION — $70,000 · OtherMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC — $100,000 · OtherMOUNTAINEER FOO…412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $100,000 · Other412 FOOD RESCUE…NEVILLE HOUSE ASSOCIATES INC — $119,310 · OtherNEVILLE HOUSE A…THE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS — $65,500 · OtherOPERATION GRATITUDE INC — $80,000 · Other+23 more — $697,500 · Other+23 moreHEKIMA PLACE INC — $401,500 · Human ServicesLEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER — $105,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HELP INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES — $70,000 · Human ServicesLibera Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $30,000 · Human Services+7 more — $130,000 · Human ServicesTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC — $500,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $100,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$5,120,000Health$2,456,000Philanthropy$1,170,000International$1,000,000Other$1,832,310Human Services$886,500Public Safety & Disaster$600,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC — $2,250,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetYOUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WV INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $705,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $650,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INC — $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC — $500,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEKIMA PLACE INC — $401,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRECONNECTING MCDOWELL INC — $250,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSEWICKLEY ACADEMY — $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSHADY SIDE ACADEMY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $165,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PATIENT HELPLINE FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetA CALL TO CARE INC — $140,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEVILLE HOUSE ASSOCIATES INC — $119,310 over 4y, 37% of budgetLEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER — $105,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetUPMC Washington — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCR JRS CHIP — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY START INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN AUTOIMMUNE RELATED DISEASES ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP INC — $100,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetDIABETES LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC — $100,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetOPERATION GRATITUDE INC — $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWV GAME CHANGERS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES — $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS — $65,500 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC — $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetVILLAGE FOR VETS — $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetLAURENS WISH ADDICTION TRIAGE CENTE — $50,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITIZENS LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON — $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLibera Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH AND MORGANTOWN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Hillman Family Founda…Eqt FoundationThe United Way of Sou…Richard King Mellon F…Equitrans Midstream F…Milan Puskar Foundati…The Grable FoundationThe Heinz EndowmentsUpmc GroupClapp G H Decd Char a…Firstenergy Foundation
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA44.5× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Eqt Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Equitrans Midstream Foundation · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Upmc Group · Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr · Firstenergy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mylan Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mylan Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mylan Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines