Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Musser Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2018
9
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Youth Development$23kEducation$13kHealth$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kHuman Services$5kReligion$5kAnimals$4k
02FY2018 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$486k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA$4,750
TEMPLE EMANU-EL OF PALM BEACH$4,000
DELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC$3,000
DREYFOOS SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION$3,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$2,950
PALM BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION$775
MARGATE COMMUNITY CHURCH$500
J WOOD PLAT TRUST$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PHILADELPHIA FREEDOM VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of The Musser Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 65% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 50%.

The Musser Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20k · 4 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$20k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+10%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +53%
  • SO
    School of the Arts Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +118%
  • DV
    DELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • CO
    CRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue -14%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -16%
  • LR
    LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Scholarship Fund Philadelphia

With over 20 years of experience and over 30,000 scholarships awarded, csfp provides philadelphia children with eight-year, needs-based scholarships to attend safe, quality, k-8th grade schools. continued on schedule o.supporting…

Education
2
Boy Scouts of America Sagamore Council 162

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—
3
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
4
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
5
Great Trail Council of Boy Scouts of America Inc

To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
6
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
7
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
8
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
9
Narragansett Council Boy Scouts of America

It is the mission of the boy scouts of america (bsa) to serve others by helping to instill values in young people and in other ways prepare them to make ethical choices over their lifetime in achieving their full potential. the values bsa…

—
10
Patriots' Path Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

Provide youth services through the execution of the charter of the national council boy scouts of america.

Youth Development
11
Boys and Girls Clubs of King County

Youth health and social, educational, and character development of youth.

Recreation & Sports
12
Boys & Girls Club of Pbc

The mission of the boys & girls club of palm beach county is to inspire and assist all young people, especially those who need them most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradle of Liberty Council 525 Boy Scouts of America; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $8,500 · OtherCRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERI…School of the Arts Foundation Inc: $5,680 · OtherSchool of the Arts Foundation IncBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL: $5,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCILCITY YEAR INC: $4,170 · OtherCITY YEAR INCTEMPLE EMANU-EL OF PALM BEACH INC: $4,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL OF PALM BEACH INC+2 more: $1,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $9,750 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS C…LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEAR…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $2,950 · HealthThe Susan G Kom…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER…PHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Crime & LegalPHILADELPH…The Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc: $775 · Crime & LegalThe Palm B…Greater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association: $5,000 · Human ServicesDELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER: $4,000 · AnimalsMIDDLE SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationCTC WELLNESS FOUNDATION: $200 · Education
Other$28,350Youth Development$9,750Health$8,950Crime & Legal$5,775Human Services$5,000Animals$4,000Education$3,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $9,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSchool of the Arts Foundation Inc: $5,680 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGreater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $4,170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIDDLE SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $2,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc: $775 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Musser Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Musser Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Musser’s filings →

More from the funding graph