Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Musser Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2018
9
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Youth Development$23kEducation$13kHealth$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kHuman Services$5kReligion$5kAnimals$4k
02FY2018 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$486k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA$4,750
TEMPLE EMANU-EL OF PALM BEACH$4,000
DREYFOOS SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION$3,000
DELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC$3,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$2,950
PALM BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION$775
MARGATE COMMUNITY CHURCH$500
J WOOD PLAT TRUST$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PHILADELPHIA FREEDOM VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 21% of The Musser Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 65% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 50% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Musser Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20k · 4 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$20k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+10%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +53%
  • SO
    School of the Arts Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +118%
  • DV
    DELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • CO
    CRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue -14%
  • GP
    Greater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Scholarship Fund Philadelphia

With over 20 years of experience and over 30,000 scholarships awarded, csfp provides philadelphia children with eight-year, needs-based scholarships to attend safe, quality, k-8th grade schools. continued on schedule o.supporting…

Education
2
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
3
Boy Scouts of America Sagamore Council 162

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

4
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
5
Boy Scouts of America 571 Circle Ten Council

The purpose of circle ten council is to promote and extend scouting in northeast texas and southeast oklahoma. our goal is to provide all youth and adults with programs, training, and awards that build character, teach participatory…

Youth Development
6
Boy Scouts of America Central Nc Council #416

The mission of the bsa is to prepare young people to make ethical decisions over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. the bsa program seeks to positively impact youth risk behaviors, juvenile crime,…

7
Great Trail Council of Boy Scouts of America Inc

To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

8
Patriots' Path Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

Provide youth services through the execution of the charter of the national council boy scouts of america.

Youth Development
9
Narragansett Council Boy Scouts of America

It is the mission of the boy scouts of america (bsa) to serve others by helping to instill values in young people and in other ways prepare them to make ethical choices over their lifetime in achieving their full potential. the values bsa…

10
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
11
Society of Gynecologic Oncology

Society of gynecologic oncology's (sgo) mission is to improve the care of patients with gynecologic cancer; to advance knowledge and raise standards of practice in gynecologic oncology; to encourage research in gynecologic oncology; and,…

Health
12
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $8,500 · OtherCRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERI…School of the Arts Foundation Inc — $5,680 · OtherSchool of the Arts Foundation IncBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL — $5,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCILCITY YEAR INC — $4,170 · OtherCITY YEAR INCTEMPLE EMANU-EL OF PALM BEACH INC — $4,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL OF PALM BEACH INC+2 more — $1,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $9,750 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS C…LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEAR…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $2,950 · HealthThe Susan G Kom…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER…PHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Crime & LegalPHILADELPH…The Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc — $775 · Crime & LegalThe Palm B…Greater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association — $5,000 · Human ServicesDELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER — $4,000 · AnimalsMIDDLE SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · EducationCTC WELLNESS FOUNDATION — $200 · Education
Other$28,350Youth Development$9,750Health$8,950Crime & Legal$5,775Human Services$5,000Animals$4,000Education$3,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $9,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSchool of the Arts Foundation Inc — $5,680 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGreater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $4,170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIDDLE SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $2,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc — $775 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Musser Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph