Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mundy Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$405k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$1.1MRecreation & Sports$500kHealth$265kPublic Safety & Disaster$250kYouth Development$250kHuman Services$225kCrime & Legal$195kAnimals$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$150,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOUSTO$50,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF FT BEND$30,000
HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
COVENANT HOUSE$25,000
THE ROSE$25,000
CASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS$25,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA$25,000
STAR OF HOPE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SKY HIGH FOR KIDS$10,000
GEORGE RANCH HIGH SCHOOL$5,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 15 repeat orgs$846k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$2.3M
$846k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-1%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Houston Food Bank
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +36%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $250k · revenue +8%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • JJ
    JUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue -19% · 46% of their budget
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • TA
    THRIVE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $57k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
2
Houston Health Foundation

Houston health foundation (hhf) has the mission of creating private/public partnerships for sustainable health and wellness initiatives and programs in our communities.

Philanthropy
3
Memorial Hermann Community Benefit Corporation

To implement solutions that promote good health for the individual, the health system and the community. we collaborate with others as well as create signature, evidence-based ways to improve the communities where people live, work, learn…

Social Science
4
Community Family Centers Inc

To equip families with the tools they need to become self-sufficent members of the community.

Human Services
5
Children's Advocacy Center of Greater West Texas

The children's advocacy center of greater west texas, inc.'s mission is to champion the prevention of child abuse and to serve as an ally of abused children with a dedication to securing a safe and nurturing home for each child.

Civil Rights
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
8
Trees of Hope

Trees of hope transforms lives with fundraising and outreach activities for the exclusive benefit of childrens programs at star of hope, houston's largest mission for the homeless.

Housing & Shelter
9
Spring Branch Community Health Center

To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.

Health
10
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
11
Pathways Youth and Family Services Inc

Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.

Human Services
12
Chance for Hope Foundation

The mission of the chance for hope foundation is to provide support services for children with cancer and their families, funding for pediatric cancer research and treatment, and educational resources to the general public regarding…

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission and the most unlike its peers is Jazz Houston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Houston Food Bank — $1,050,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankAMERICAN RED CROSS — $250,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCHILD ADVOCATES OF FT BEND — $175,000 · OtherCHILD ADVOCATES OF FT BENDTHE ROSE — $125,000 · OtherTHE ROSECASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC — $100,000 · Other+10 more — $205,740 · Other+10 moreJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · Recreation & SportsJUSTIN J WATT FOUN…Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc — $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 · HealthSKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC — $40,000 · HealthCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $125,000 · Human ServicesHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $100,000 · AnimalsSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,905,740Recreation & Sports$500,000Youth Development$250,000Health$140,000Human Services$125,000Animals$100,000Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $1,050,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc — $250,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ROSE — $125,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $125,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHRIVE ACADEMY — $57,240 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJazz Houston — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFt Bend County Child Advocates Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds JUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc
  • Who funds THE ROSE
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS
  • Who funds HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds CASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC
  • Who funds THRIVE ACADEMY
  • Who funds SKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC
  • Who funds Jazz Houston
  • Who funds Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mundy Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mundy Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Mundy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph