Skip to content
The Mundt Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Mundt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$400kInternational$13kEducation$9kFood & Nutrition$8kScience & Tech$3kRecreation & Sports$2kCrime & Legal$2kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$496k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER$4,000
FIRST PARISH CHURCH IN LINCOLN$2,500
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$1,000
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PMC: $15k → 7%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $8k → 16%CITIZEN'S CLIMATE LOBBY: $1k → 11%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $3k → 17%HQ TENNIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%UNITED THEATER: $1k → 7%THE HERREN PROJECT: $3k → 7%PAN MASS CHALLENGE: $3k → 7%FIRST PARISH CHURCH IN LINCOLN: $3k → 8%HARVARD VARSITY CLUB: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1k → 17%CHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC: $1k → 20%PAN MASS CHALLENGE: $3k → 7%FIRST PARISH CHURCH IN LINCOLN: $3k → 8%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1k → 17%PAN MASS CHALLENGE: $1k → 7%FIRST PARISH CHURCH IN LINCOLN: $3k → 8%TECH GOES HOME: $2k → 16%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1k → 17%THINKER ANALYTIX: $3k → 8%STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1k → 17%FIRST PARISH CHURCH IN LINCOLN: $2k → 8%TECH GOES HOME: $1k → 16%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1k → 17%CODMAN FARM: $2k → 8%BRIGHAM WOMENS: $304k → 16%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $5k → 17%FIRST PARISH CHURCH IN LINCOLN: $1k → 8%BRIGHAM WOMENS: $17k → 16%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1k → 17%CODMAN COMMUNITY FARM: $1k → 8%DANA FARBER: $7k → 16%CODMAN COMMUNITY FARM: $1k → 8%BRIGHAM WOMENS: $7k → 16%CODMAN FARM: $1k → 8%DANA FARBER: $4k → 16%FRIENDS FOR TOMORROW: $1k → 8%DANA FARBER: $4k → 16%FRIENDS FOR TOMORROW: $1k → 8%DANA FARBER: $3k → 16%CODMAN FARM: $1k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL: $2k → 16%FIRST PARISH CHURCH IN LINCOLN: $1k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 16%CODMAN FARM: $1k → 8%EPIPHANY SCHOOL: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$402k · 14 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$402k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+2%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DANA-FARBER INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +94%
  • AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $8k · revenue +3%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • P
    PMC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • TH
    THE HERREN PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
4
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
5
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
7
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
8
Cfa Society Boston Inc

Cfa society boston members promote the highest ethical standards, best practices and professional development within the investment industry to educate and build trust in the community it serves.

—
9
Techbridge Inc

Techbridge breaks the cycle of generational poverty through the innovative use of technology to transform nonprofit and community impact. techbridge's work is focused on four pillars: hunger relief, homeless support, social justice and…

Philanthropy
10
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
11
Jewish Vocational Service Inc

To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.

Employment
12
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Citizens Climate Lobby. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIGHAM WOMENS: $328,443 · OtherBRIGHAM WOMENSDANA-FARBER INC: $17,500 · OtherPMC: $15,000 · Other+14 more: $52,650 · Other+14 moreAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $7,500 · HealthTHE HERREN PROJECT: $2,500 · HealthFriends For Tomorrow Inc: $2,000 · HealthTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC: $4,000 · EducationThinker Analytix Inc: $2,500 · EducationHARVARD VARSITY CLUB INC: $1,000 · EducationTHE BOSTON BRIDGES INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 · EducationSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $500 · EducationCODMAN COMMUNITY FARMS INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC: $1,500 · Crime & LegalThe Philanthropy Connection Inc: $1,125 · PhilanthropyHQ TENNIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$413,593Health$12,000Education$10,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Crime & Legal$1,500Philanthropy$1,125Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERREN PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends For Tomorrow Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCODMAN COMMUNITY FARMS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Philanthropy Connection Inc: $1,125 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE LOBBY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOSTON BRIDGES INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncEastern Bank Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Boston Foundation IncMA14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mundt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mundt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Tech Goes Home Incorporated: 10% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind: 7% of income from government
  • The Epiphany School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Steppingstone Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mundt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home