Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Muhs Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$672kHealth$206kHousing & Shelter$60kYouth Development$52kEducation$38kPhilanthropy$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kHuman Services$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF ST RITA$55,000
MATER DOLOROSA PASSIONIST RETREAT CENTER$30,000
JOHN TRACY CENTER$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GLAAC$7,500
ARCHDIOCESE OF LA - TOGETHER IN MISSION$5,000
CALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
ST JOHNS SEMINARY$2,500
SIERRA MADRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$2,000
DOLORES MISSION CHURCH$2,000
FLINTRIDGE SACRED HEART ACADEMY$2,000
SIERRA MADRE SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM$2,000
ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $25k → 14%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $20k → 14%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $10k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $10k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $5k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 29 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+57%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentReligionPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JT
    JOHN TRACY CLINIC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $191k · revenue +138%
  • MD
    MATER DOLOROSA PASSIONIST RETREAT CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +70%
  • SG
    SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • AB
    ALLIANCE BUILDERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & SCHOLARSHIPSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +57%
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
4
Saint Mary's College of California

Saint mary's college of california invites you to passionately embrace knowledge, the challenges of scholarship, and the capacity to make lasting change in the world. the foundation for this is our mission. to probe deeply the mystery of…

Education
5
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
6
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
San Jose State University Research Foundation

As an integral member of the san jose state university community, the san jose state university research foundation provides an entrepreneurial framework through which local, state and federal agencies, businesses and private foundations…

Education
9
California State University Los Angeles Foundation

To advance the educational, cultural, scholarly, and creative activities and the role of community service of csula by increasing private funding, responsibly managing donated resources and supporting the university and its diverse and…

Education
10
California Institute of Integral Studies

Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…

Education
11
Credit Unions in the State of California Sierra Central Credit Union

As your financial institution, we pledge to serve you and our community faithfully. we will be friendly, helpful, and professional, and we will provide great products and competitive rates.

—
12
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sierra Madre Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Nami Glendale. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF ST RITA: $378,500 · OtherCHURCH OF ST RITAST RITA PARISH: $130,100 · OtherST RITA PARISHIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN GABRIEL VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $60,000 · OtherSAN GABRIEL VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC+19 more: $146,000 · Other+19 moreJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $191,000 · Human ServicesJOHN TRACY CLINICMATER DOLOROSA PASSIONIST RETREAT CENTER: $80,000 · ReligionGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $41,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $10,500 · Youth DevelopmentCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8,500 · EducationART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN: $8,500 · Education826LA: $5,500 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & SCHOLARSHIPS: $1,000 · EducationSIERRA MADRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,500 · PhilanthropySIERRA MADRE SEARCH & RESCUE TEAM: $9,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSIERRA MADRE ROSE FLOAT ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · Community Improvement
Other$794,600Human Services$191,000Religion$80,000Youth Development$51,500Education$23,500Philanthropy$9,500Public Safety & Disaster$9,000Community Improvement$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $191,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMATER DOLOROSA PASSIONIST RETREAT CENTER: $80,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSAN GABRIEL VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $60,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $41,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI GLENDALE: $15,000 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA MADRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetSIERRA MADRE SEARCH & RESCUE TEAM: $9,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILL UNITY CENTER INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget826LA: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA MADRE ROSE FLOAT ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & SCHOLARSHIPS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHN TRACY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds MATER DOLOROSA PASSIONIST RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NAMI GLENDALE ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA MADRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA MADRE SEARCH & RESCUE TEAM ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds 826LA ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA MADRE ROSE FLOAT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & SCHOLARSHIPS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pasadena Community FoundationCA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Michael & Patricia Smith Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Muhs Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Muhs Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Muhs Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Muhs Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Muhs Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph