Skip to content
The Moya Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Moya Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$768k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$768k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$798kArts & Culture$51kHuman Services$32kFood & Nutrition$13kReligion$11kHealth$11kPhilanthropy$8kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$768,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$768,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA SAN JOSE: $2k → 11%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%MID CITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 18%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 18%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 18%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 18%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $2k → 18%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $2k → 18%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 18%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 18%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 18%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$914k · 23 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
19

Total granted

$914k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+54%

Still filing today

43%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $784k · revenue +53%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +103%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CB
    CATHEDRAL BEACON ON THE HILL PROJECT
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • LA
    LATIN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • CS
    CASA SAN JOSEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
2
St Joseph Care Center

To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.

Health
3
Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center Inc

We, saint joseph regional medical center (sjrmc) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sjrmc is a member of trinity health.

Health
4
Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center - Plymouth Campus Inc

We, saint joseph regional medical center, inc. and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.saint joseph regional medical center-plymouth campus…

Health
5
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
6
St Joseph's Health Center Properties Inc

We, st. joseph's health center properties and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. joseph's health center properties is a member of st.…

Health
7
Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc

To support the benevolent, charitable, scientific, religious, and educational activities of public charitable corporations. to perform, foster and support acts of christian charity among the sick, ailing and needy, and to provide resources…

Philanthropy
8
St Joseph Area Chamber of Commerce

To serve as a catalyst for economic grown and development in northwest missouri

—
9
St Joseph's Physician Health Pc

We, st. joseph's physician health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
10
St Josephs Hospital

Ministers to inpatients and outpatients, serving a primary care and specialty referral center for people from all faiths living in chemung county and the surrounding counties of new york and pennsylvania

—
11
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
12
St Joseph's Hospital Health Center Foundation Inc

We, st. joseph's hospital health center foundation and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. joseph's hospital health center foundation is…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater St Joseph; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $784,000 · OtherMISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC+28 more: $96,000 · Other+28 moreYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH: $10,500 · Human ServicesCASA SAN JOSE: $2,150 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesMIDCITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY: $1,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH MUSEUMS INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $2,000 · Arts & CultureST JOSEPH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC: $10,700 · HealthUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH: $8,000 · PhilanthropyPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $2,000 · Environment
Other$880,000Human Services$18,650Arts & Culture$14,000Education$12,000Health$10,700Philanthropy$8,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $784,000 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC: $10,700 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH: $10,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH MUSEUMS INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCASA SAN JOSE: $2,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF ST JOSEPH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH YOUTH ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDCITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFriends of the Park: $1,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH MUSEUMS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CASA SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF ST JOSEPH INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH YOUTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MIDCITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Park ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Commerce Bancshares F…The Community Foundat…The Depriest Family F…Heartland Regional Me…Norma J and William J…Harold P Dugdale Char…Wm and Margaret Schre…The Shumaker Family F…William D Morgan Char…Edward Jones Foundati…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…
Commerce Bancshares FoundationMO23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · The Depriest Family Foundation Inc · Heartland Regional Medical Center · Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable · Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · The Shumaker Family Foundation · William D Morgan Charitable Foundation 005827 · Edward Jones Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moya Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moya Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moya Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home