Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morton Mendes Charitable Founda

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$74kRecreation & Sports$27kHealth$14kEducation$14kEnvironment$10kFood & Nutrition$8kReligion$7kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$302k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURAL HORSEMANSHIP CENTER$3,500
GENTLE GIANT DRAFT HORSE RESCUE$3,280
MIDCOAST HUMANE$3,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,660
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF$1,660
HOLA OHIO$1,660
LITTLE LONG EARS DONKEY RESCUE$1,000
DARROWBY FARM SANCTUARY$1,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$500
Individual grant recipient$500
PASADENA HUMANE$500
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$500
FEEDING AMERICA$500
SMILE TRAIN$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $40) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $40 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
IL
NY
OR
SD
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 34 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
31

Total granted

$159k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+13%

Still filing today

53%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LITTLE LONGEARS MINI DONKEY RESCUE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +369%
  • GS
    Good Shepherd Food Bank
    6× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +83%
  • CF
    Chewonki Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CW
    CORUS WORLD HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • JH
    JUNIPER HILL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PAUL BUNYAN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +134%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
5
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
6
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
7
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
10
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
11
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
12
Akashinga Inc

Deliver ecological stability and long-term protection of large-scale wilderness by supporting and empowering local communities.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Paul Bunyan Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
26/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATURAL HORSEMANSHIP CENTER: $30,450 · OtherNATURAL HORSEMANSHIP CENTERHORSE AND RIDER CONNECTION: $30,115 · OtherHORSE AND RIDER CONNECTIONGENTLE GIANT DRAFT HORSE RESCUE: $15,010 · OtherGENTLE GIANT DRAFT HORSE RESCUEMAINE MARITIME ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherMAINE MARITIME ACADEMYFUNDACION HOGAR ESPERANZA: $6,000 · Other+46 more: $33,077 · Other+46 moreLITTLE LONGEARS MINI DONKEY RESCUE INC: $7,500 · AnimalsLITTLE LONGEARS MI…Darrowby Farm Sanctuary: $6,000 · AnimalsDarrowby Farm Sanc…THE CLOUD FOUNDATION: $4,500 · AnimalsTHE CLOUD FOUNDATI…MIDCOAST HUMANE: $3,000 · AnimalsMIDCOAST HUMANEDefenders of Wildlife: $2,600 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildl…HABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $2,000 · AnimalsHABITAT FOR HORSES…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,785 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIE…Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $1,020 · AnimalsPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $1,000 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsGood Shepherd Food Bank: $7,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $500 · Food & NutritionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,660 · InternationalCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $2,109 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,700 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $500 · InternationalTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $7,100 · HealthChewonki Foundation Inc: $3,000 · EnvironmentWOODIE WHEATON LAND TRUST: $2,000 · EnvironmentMidcoast Conservancy: $1,500 · Environment+3 more: $235 · EnvironmentHOLA OHIO: $1,660 · Community Improvement
Other$124,652Animals$29,905Food & Nutrition$8,000International$7,469Health$7,100Environment$6,735Community Improvement$1,660

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE LONGEARS MINI DONKEY RESCUE INC: $7,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $7,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDarrowby Farm Sanctuary: $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CLOUD FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetChewonki Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIDCOAST HUMANE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $2,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $2,480 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $2,109 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOODIE WHEATON LAND TRUST: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,785 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMidcoast Conservancy: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPINE TREE SOCIETY INC: $1,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTPORT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,050 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $1,020 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PAUL BUNYAN FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetPEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $619 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORRIS FARM TRUST: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE LONGEARS MINI DONKEY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Darrowby Farm Sanctuary ↗
  • Who funds THE CLOUD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIDCOAST HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HORSES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODIE WHEATON LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLA OHIO ↗
  • Who funds Midcoast Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds PINE TREE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTPORT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PAUL BUNYAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEACE RIDGE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elsie & William Viles Foundation · Reny Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morton Mendes Charitable Founda funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morton Mendes Charitable Founda. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Morton Mendes Charitable Founda?

Find your warmest path to The Morton Mendes Charitable Founda through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morton Mendes Charitable Founda’s filings →

More from the funding graph