Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morris Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$732k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.3MHealth$1.1MReligion$559kEducation$350kHuman Services$316kInternational$20kScience & Tech$20kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $613k
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC$117,656
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC$105,293
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NORTHWEST BERGEN COUNTY INC$100,000
VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$85,000
SIBS PLACE INC$55,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$50,000
THREEFOLD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION & SCHOOL$50,000
ITREK INC$50,000
SHARSHERET INC$30,000
YOUNG MENS-YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSOCIATION OF BERG$25,000
JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC$19,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NORTHWEST BERGEN COUNTY INC$18,000
FOR INSPIRATION AND RECOGNITION OF SCIENCE AND TEC$15,000
JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC$5,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEY INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $929k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SIBS PLACE INC: $250k → 6%YOUNG MENS-YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSOCIATION OF BERG: $25k → 14%SIBS PLACE INC: $64k → 6%JCC ROCKLAND INC: $4k → 14%SIBS PLACE INC: $55k → 6%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $200k → 7%SIBS PLACE INC: $42k → 6%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $19k → 7%SIBS PLACE INC: $25k → 6%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $19k → 7%SIBS PLACE INC: $25k → 6%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $12k → 7%SIBS PLACE INC: $25k → 6%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $6k → 7%SIBS PLACE INC: $25k → 6%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $5k → 7%SIBS PLACE INC: $25k → 6%SIBS PLACE INC: $25k → 6%SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 → 6%SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 → 6%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEW: $48k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEW: $30k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
OH
NJ
CA
CO
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of The Morris Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Morris Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 16 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$2.8M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-17%

Still filing today

88%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationInternationalScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THREEFOLD EDUCATION FOUNDATION AND SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $400k · revenue +12%
  • JH
    JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $261k · revenue +81%
  • SI
    Sharsheret Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $165k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • HM
    Hackensack Meridian Health Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -52%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS-YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSOCIATION OF BERG
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
4
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
5
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
6
Jewish Home At Home Inc

Providing charitable services to the elderly or infirm to assist them to continue to reside in their home environment.

Human Services
7
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
8
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
9
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
10
United Jewish Federation of Northeastern New York Inc

To build / maintain a strong and united jewish community in order to ensure the continuity of the jewish people. the federation is the central agency for meeting jewish needs and articulating jewish concerns in the capital region, in…

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey

The jewish federation of southern new jersey cares for those in need, enhances jewish life and ensures the continuity of a vibrant jewish community locally, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
12
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc; the most unlike its peers is City Harvest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $930,106 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW …JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $420,293 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BE…SIBS PLACE INC: $560,500 · Human ServicesSIBS PLACE INCJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $260,800 · Human ServicesJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION …JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $78,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRE…+3 more: $29,600 · Human ServicesCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NORTHWEST BERGEN COUNTY INC: $622,500 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NO…HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH INC: $100,000 · OtherHACKENSACK MERIDIAN HE…Rutgers Hillel Corporation: $50,000 · OtherRutgers Hillel Corpora…For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST): $35,000 · Other+7 more: $54,000 · Other+7 moreTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $397,500 · HealthTHE VALLEY HOSP…Sharsheret Inc: $165,000 · HealthSharsheret IncHackensack Meridian Health Inc: $25,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthTHREEFOLD EDUCATION FOUNDATION AND SCHOOL: $400,000 · EducationTHREEFOLD …FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $200,000 · Community ImprovementITREK INC: $70,000 · International
Philanthropy$1,350,399Human Services$928,900Other$861,500Health$597,500Education$400,000Community Improvement$200,000International$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $930,106 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetSIBS PLACE INC: $560,500 over 6y, 31% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $420,293 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHREEFOLD EDUCATION FOUNDATION AND SCHOOL: $400,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $397,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $260,800 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $165,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $78,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetITREK INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFor Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST): $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHackensack Meridian Health Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS-YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSOC OF BERGEN COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJCC ROCKLAND INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Russell Berrie FoundationNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Russell Berrie Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morris Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morris Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Services of Northern New Jersey Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Morris Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Morris Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morris’ filings →

More from the funding graph