Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

SwedishAmerican Health Foundation

To provide financial and in-kind support for the stated missions of SwedishAmerican Hospital System Corporation, UW Health SwedishAmerican Hospital, and the affiliates operating in the State of Illinois.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$309k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$8.8MYouth Development$100kHousing & Shelter$62kCrime & Legal$61kHuman Services$34kSocial Science$29kCommunity Improvement$27kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$308,888
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SwedishAmerican Hospital$308,888
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Family Counseling Services of Northern Illinois: $20k → 15%Family Counseling Services Northern Illinois: $18k → 15%Youth Services Network Inc: $16k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.9M · 8 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
20

Total granted

$8.9M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SwedishAmerican Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.8M · revenue +77%
  • SY
    STATELINE YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    3× · 2019–2022 · $42k · revenue +181%
  • FC
    FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF NO IL
    2× · 2018–2021 · $38k · revenue +324%

Funded once

  • BT
    BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY NORTHERN ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2018 · $29k · revenue -3%
  • AF
    AWAKEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • RA
    ROCKFORD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $17k · revenue +133%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stepping Stones of Rockford Inc

Residential rehabilitation for mentally and emotionally disabled adults.

Human Services
2
Rockford Regional Health Council

Rockford regional health council is a not-for-profit social service corporation organized under the laws of the state of illinois for the purpose of improving community health through data gatering and analysis, education and advocacy.

3
Rockford Christian Education Association

To challenge young people to know christ as lord, apply god's truth in all areas of life, love others sacrifically, and achieve the highest level of knowledge and skill in order to serve god and others

Education
4
The Rockford Institute

To provide analysis and commentary on cultural, economic, political, and educational issues through a published monthly opinion magazine and to operate continuing adult educational conferences in american and european literature and…

5
Rockford Promise

Vision statement: enhance economic vitality in the rockford region by providing access to post-secondary education for all rockford public school graduates. - mission statement: remove financial barriers by offering full-tuition…

Education
6
Northwest Community Center

To enrich the quality of life within the diverse population of northwest rockford.

7
Rockford Community Service Center

North kent connect is a christian organization committed to improving the lives of all people in northern kent county by providing access to basic needs and promoting economic independence.

Human Services
8
Rockford Sharefest

Rockford sharefest exists to identify, develop and lead projects that empower and release volunteers and donors to use their god-given gifts, abilities and resources to make an impact for the common good. rockford sharefest is bringing…

Community Improvement
9
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
10
Youth Service Bureau

The Youth Service Bureau provides services to at-risk youth who are, or are at risk of becoming, runaway, abused, neglected and/or homeless. Services are also available for their family members.

11
Mosaic Illinois Housing of Rockford I

The organization provides low income affordable housing under illinois housing development authority guidelines.

Health
12
Rockford Day Nursery

It is the mission of this corporation to provide quality care for children between the ages of six weeks and twelve years whose parents are employed or in training.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockford Rescue Mission Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Transform Rockford. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Recreation & Soci…Rockford Area SchoolsRockford Community Organiza…Northern Illinois Community…Faith-Based Social ServicesRegional Economic Developme…Community Service Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr15%17%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr14%48%35–55yr24%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr15%1%10–20yr15%0%20–35yr14%2%35–55yr24%97%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
10%
119/1,234

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SwedishAmerican Hospital — $8,757,615 · HealthSwedishAmerican Hospital+1 more — $5,000 · HealthSTATELINE YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $42,000 · OtherAWAKEN FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD — $15,000 · OtherSalvation Army Metropolitan Chicago — $15,000 · OtherEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA — $13,000 · OtherZION OUTREACH — $12,000 · OtherROCKFORD AREA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES — $8,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 · OtherRockford Barbell — $17,454 · OtherROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES — $16,609 · OtherTRANSFORM ROCKFORD — $15,000 · OtherLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $11,400 · OtherPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $12,500 · OtherFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF NO IL — $37,735 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentKFACT INC KEEPING FAMILIES & COMMUNITIES TOGETHER — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCK HOUSE KIDS — $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCKFORD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $17,000 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC — $12,000 · Housing & ShelterVETERANS DROP-IN CENTER — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $29,000 · Social ScienceROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Environment
Health$8,762,615Other$227,963Human Services$53,735Youth Development$46,000Housing & Shelter$39,000Social Science$29,000Environment$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSwedishAmerican Hospital — $8,757,615 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSTATELINE YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $42,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF NO IL — $37,735 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRockford Barbell — $17,454 over 2y, 22% of budgetROCKFORD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $17,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES — $16,609 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC — $16,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRANSFORM ROCKFORD — $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKFACT INC KEEPING FAMILIES & COMMUNITIES TOGETHER — $15,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetMOSAIC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCK HOUSE KIDS — $11,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS DROP-IN CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetROCKFORD REACHOUT JAIL MINISTRY — $7,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetROCKFORD SEXUAL ASSAULT COUNSELING INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWINNEBAGO COUNTY 911 EMERGENCY RESPONDERS MEMORIAL NFP — $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · The Kjellstrom Family Foundation · United Way of Rock River Valley · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · Kiwanis Charities of Rockford Inc · The Mill Foundation · Blazer Foundation · Jeffrey R Anderson Charitable Foundation · Tracy E Anderson Charitable Foundation · The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation · Woodward Governor Charitable Trust · Northern Illinois Food Bank

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization SwedishAmerican Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph