Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mike Leprino Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Animals$1.8MPhilanthropy$1.8MArts & Culture$506kHealth$443kYouth Development$100kEducation$45kEmployment$10kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS DIABETES FOUNDATION$10,000
OPERA COLORADO$6,000
PEPPER SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SACRED HEART SCHOOL: $25k → 11%CAL POLY RODEO: $5k → 12%OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL: $5k → 7%OPERA COLORADO: $6k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%PEPPER SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $1.8M → 12%AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $1.8M → 13%TSC ALLIANCE: $1k → 8%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER: $25k → 11%CAL POLY RODEO: $5k → 12%COLORADO ACADEMY: $20k → 7%CHILDRENS DIABETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%PEPPER SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $5k → 12%MCCALLUM THEATRE: $5k → 11%CHILDRENS DIABETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%PEPPER SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $5k → 12%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 11%PEPPER SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $5k → 12%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $22k → 12%ANIMAL SAMARITANS: $2k → 11%DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $14k → 12%DENVER CITY LAX: $1k → 12%DENVER CITY LAX: $1k → 12%DENVER CITY LAX: $1k → 12%MIZEL INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC-1000 CAREERS CAMPAIGN: $10k → 12%SUSAN G KOMEN: $500 → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $170k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $90k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $85k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $50k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $50k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $40k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 8 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$2.8M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+54%

Still filing today

63%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthAnimalsEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DENVER ART MUSEUM
    6× · 2017–2022 · $485k · revenue +7%
  • DD
    DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $36k · revenue +254%
  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE STEABOAT INSTITUTE OF INSPIRING AMERICANS TO GREATNESS
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • CA
    COLORADO ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
3
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
4
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
5
The Denver Foundation

To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.

Philanthropy
6
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
7
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
8
Denver Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau

To bring conventions and leisure visitors to denver for the economic benefit of the city, the community, and our partners.

—
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
American Academy of Dermatology Inc

To assure that dermatologists have access to the highest quality education, research and innovations in the field, and that patients and the public have access to the highest quality medical and surgical dermatologic care and to…

Health
11
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
12
Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce

The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League; the most unlike its peers is National Tuberous Sclerosis Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEPPER SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $1,788,120 · OtherPEPPER SENIOR DOG SANCTUARYUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE STEABOAT INSTITUTE OF INSPIRING AMERICANS TO GREATNESS: $100,000 · Other+7 more: $56,000 · OtherAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $1,773,699 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER ART MUSEUM: $485,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART …+2 more: $11,000 · Arts & CultureEisenhower Medical Center: $26,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $35,500 · AnimalsAnimal Samaritans: $1,500 · AnimalsCOLORADO ACADEMY: $20,000 · EducationRANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL: $10,000 · EducationDENVER CITY LAX: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,344,120Philanthropy$1,778,699Arts & Culture$496,000Health$42,500Animals$37,000Education$30,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $1,773,699 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $485,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $35,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $26,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO ACADEMY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPERA COLORADO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER CITY LAX: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAnimal Samaritans: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds OPERA COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER CITY LAX ↗
  • Who funds Animal Samaritans ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mike Leprino Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mike Leprino Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mike Leprino Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Mike Leprino Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mike Leprino Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph