Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Middleton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$784k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of The Middleton Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Silicon Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
9
’18
11
’19
8
’20
9
’21
12
’22
8
’23
9
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$4.0MRecreation & Sports$577kInternational$227kEducation$143kScience & Tech$25kHealth$24kAnimals$21kEnvironment$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE$75,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$50,000
SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HARWARD UNIVERSITY GIFT$5,000
VIEWPOINT SCHOOL$5,000
ANANDA CHURCH$5,000
JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION$4,000
RANCHO SANTE FE ROTARY$3,700
COALITION TO SALUTE AMER$2,000
THE LEAKEY FOUNDATION$2,000
SAN MATEO PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
CA HIGHWAY PATROL 11-99$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMFORT CUB: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
SD
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
KS
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 36 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
19

Total granted

$1.5M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+25%

Still filing today

28%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentAnimalsSocial SciencePublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VE
    VIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +38%
  • SH
    SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +175%
  • M
    MUTTVILLE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $16k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LIVER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MADERA ANIMAL SHELTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
7
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
8
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
9
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
10
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The James Beard Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $4,000,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community Foundation+1 more: $6,250 · PhilanthropyUNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE: $562,500 · OtherUNITED STATES OLYMPIC COM…Individual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…MIT: $125,000 · OtherMITVIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $73,500 · OtherVIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOU…+44 more: $282,744 · Other+44 moreOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $220,000 · International+2 more: $2,046 · InternationalSCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE: $25,000 · Science & TechMUTTVILLE: $16,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF MADERA ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 · AnimalsLSB LEAKEY FDTN FOR RESEARCH RELATED TO HUMAN ORIGINS BEHAVIOR AND SURVIVAL: $16,000 · Social SciencePollinator Partnership: $8,000 · EnvironmentHILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$4,006,250Other$1,218,744International$222,046Science & Tech$25,000Animals$21,000Social Science$16,000Environment$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $4,000,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $220,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $73,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLSB LEAKEY FDTN FOR RESEARCH RELATED TO HUMAN ORIGINS BEHAVIOR AND SURVIVAL: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPollinator Partnership: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $6,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MADERA ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Comfort Cub Program Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds VIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds LSB LEAKEY FDTN FOR RESEARCH RELATED TO HUMAN ORIGINS BEHAVIOR AND SURVIVAL ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pollinator Partnership ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MADERA ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSBOROUGH BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Middleton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Middleton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Middleton’s filings →

More from the funding graph