Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Impact Through Golf Foundation

The organization provides funding to organizations that support health and wellness, education, youth and family support, homelessness, natural disaster recovery, rebuilding support, preparedness, and capital improvement.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Human Services$1.4MHealth$958kYouth Development$800kFood & Nutrition$765kRecreation & Sports$686kPhilanthropy$550kEducation$393kCommunity Improvement$350kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $212k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $870k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CATHEDRAL CITY$200,000
DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION$150,000
FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC$100,000
PUEBLO UNIDO CDC$90,000
MIA'S MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC$80,000
COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION$50,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
GALILEE CENTER$50,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$50,000
JOHN F KENNEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$50,000
MANHATTAN UNIVERSITY$48,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE DESERT INC$40,000
MUSC FOUNDATION$27,500
GIRLFRIEND FACTOR$25,000
COACHELLA VALLEY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $100k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 14%MIA'S MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC: $80k → 10%YMCA OF THE DESERT: $100k → 11%Variety - Children's Charity of the Desert: $25k → 11%Family YMCA of the Desert: $15k → 11%Variety - Children's Charity of the Desert: $10k → 11%YMCA OF THE DESERT: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $100k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $20k → 11%Galilee Center: $75k → 11%GALILEE CENTER: $50k → 11%GALILEE CENTER: $50k → 11%Galilee Center: $35k → 11%GALILEE CENTER: $25k → 11%MARTHA'S VILLAGE & KITCHEN INC: $150k → 11%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $75k → 11%MARTHA'S VILLAGE & KITCHEN INC: $75k → 11%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 11%Martha's Village and Kitchen: $50k → 11%Martha's Village and Kitchen: $45k → 11%Martha's Village & Kitchen Inc: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OR
NJ
CA
SC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 34 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
18

Total granted

$5.0M
$840k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $234k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KU
    KPMG US FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $350k · revenue +71%
  • MV
    MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $335k · revenue +46%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CATHEDRAL CITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $310k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • DC
    DESERT CLASSIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $465k · revenue -88%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN
    one grant, 2021 · $53k · revenue +8%
  • BG
    BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
3
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…

Community Improvement
4
Coachella Valley Foster Kids

In 2019 the juvenile dependency attorneys in indio formed coachella valley foster kids. we represent on average 1200 to 1500 youths in the foster system. these kids have either been permanently removed from their parents, or are in the…

Youth Development
5
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
6
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center

Our mission - pomona valley hospital medical center (pvhmc) is dedicated to providing high-quality, cost-effective health care services to residents of the greater pomona valley. the medical center offers a full range of services from…

Health
7
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
10
Hospice of the Valleys Sc Inc

We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.

Human Services
11
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
12
Friends of the Children - Coachella Valley

Friends of the children coachella valley (friends cv) has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92%…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pegasus Therapeutic Riding Center of Coachella Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand & Wildlife ConservationChristian Missionary Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…Higher Education SupportYouth & Special Needs Progr…Youth Sports ProgramsFamily Philanthropic Founda…Child and Family Support Se…Regional Health & Wellness …Arts & Cultural Institutions
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%32%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%39%35–55yr13%12%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/60
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,918

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/59
Grantees still filing
38/59
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $335,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITC…COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION — $265,000 · Human ServicesCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE M…GALILEE CENTER INC — $235,000 · Human ServicesGALILEE CENTER INCFAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT — $225,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERTJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT — $120,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF …MIAS MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesMIAS MIRACLES FOUNDATION …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 · Human Services+3 more — $87,750 · Human Services+3 moreDESERT CLASSIC CHARITIES — $464,652 · OtherDESERT CLASSIC CHARITIESJOHN F KENNEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $130,000 · OtherJOHN F KENNEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATIO…DESERT ARC — $90,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of Palm Springs — $75,000 · OtherKPMG US FOUNDATION INC — $350,000 · OtherKPMG US FOUNDATION INCCOACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLF FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherCOACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLF FOUND…WORLD GOLF FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · OtherPUEBLO UNIDO CDC — $125,000 · OtherPUEBLO UNIDO CDC+13 more — $342,000 · Other+13 moreFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $745,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD IN NEED …Coachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine — $195,000 · HealthCoachella V…Eisenhower Medical Center — $150,000 · HealthEisenhower …Autism Society Inland Empire Inc — $35,000 · HealthAutism Soci…Hanson House Foundation Inc — $30,000 · HealthOLIVE CREST — $30,000 · HealthDESERT CANCER FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $27,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 · HealthLifeStream Blood Bank — $25,000 · HealthALZHEIMERS COACHELLA VALLEY — $25,000 · Health+4 more — $52,500 · Health+4 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CATHEDRAL CITY — $310,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GI…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY — $205,348 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRL…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE DES — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHER…THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $450,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DISCOV…BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyBIGHORN GO…CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA…DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $110,000 · EducationTHE GIRLFRIEND FACTOR — $105,000 · EducationManhattan University — $48,000 · EducationONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY — $40,000 · EducationTOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC — $40,000 · EducationTHINK TOGETHER — $25,000 · EducationRead With Me Volunteer Programs — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · Education
Human Services$1,397,750Other$1,796,652Food & Nutrition$745,000Health$625,000Youth Development$615,348Philanthropy$550,000Education$393,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $745,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $450,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetKPMG US FOUNDATION INC — $350,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $335,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CATHEDRAL CITY — $310,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION — $265,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetGALILEE CENTER INC — $235,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT — $225,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY — $205,348 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCoachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine — $195,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH GOLF FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $130,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetPUEBLO UNIDO CDC — $125,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT — $120,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetDESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 3y, 70% of budgetTHE GIRLFRIEND FACTOR — $105,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE DES — $100,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetDESERT ARC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMIAS MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Palm Springs — $75,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetWORLD GOLF FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN — $52,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetPegasus Therapeutic Riding Center of Coachella Valley — $50,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetBIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan University — $48,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY BOXING CLUB — $41,500 over 3y, 24% of budgetONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY — $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC — $40,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHUNTER LOPEZ MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $37,750 over 3y, 14% of budgetAutism Society Inland Empire Inc — $35,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetVariety Childrens Charities of the Desert Tent 66 — $35,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetHanson House Foundation Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT CANCER FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DESERT MOUNTAINS — $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLifeStream Blood Bank — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHINK TOGETHER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS COACHELLA VALLEY — $25,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetHARC INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFood Now Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetIRAQ STAR INC — $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bighorn Golf Club Cha…Inland Empire Communi…Regional Access Proje…HN and Frances C Berg…Anderson Childrens Fo…The Champions Volunte…Houston Family Founda…The Coeta and Donald …The Grace Helen Spear…Desert Community Foun…United Way of the Des…Charity Works
Bighorn Golf Club Charities IncCA70× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Desert Community Foundation · United Way of the Desert · Charity Works

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Impact Through Golf Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines