Skip to content

California · Public charity

United Way of the Desert

To break the cycle of poverty in the Coachella Valley through mobilizing the caring power of community.

$227k
Granted FY2023
11
Itemized grants FY2023
11
Organizations funded FY2023
9%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$125k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$8,500
Largest grant, FY2023
$39,651
Organizations funded a year
1 to 16
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 9% of the organizations United Way of the Desert funded were first-time grantees, receiving 32% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202311$125k9%
FY202211$85k9%
FY20217$133k0%
FY202016$380k38%
FY201913$245k31%
FY20181$20k0%
FY20179$204kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$399kFood & Nutrition$283kYouth Development$278kHealth$154kPhilanthropy$40kHousing & Shelter$20kCivil Rights$10kEmployment$8k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($7k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget United Way of the Desert supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFamily YMCA of the Desert: $162,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley: $146,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetJewish Family Service of the Desert: $133,554 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Cathedral City: $131,900 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetMartha's Village and Kitchen Inc: $125,800 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGalilee Center Inc: $91,370 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetFood in Need of Distribution Inc: $89,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDesert Arc: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJohn F Kennedy Memorial Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetInland Southern California United Way: $39,651 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDesert Cancer Foundation: $34,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFood Now Inc: $24,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLift to Rise: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCoachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine: $12,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDAP Health Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMizell Center: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bighorn Golf Club Charities IncCA30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Regional Access Project Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · Impact Through Golf Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · Desert Community Foundation · Coachella Valley Wellness Foundation · Food in Need of Distribution Inc · The Auen Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare United Way of the Desert with peer funders

About United Way of the Desert

How much does United Way of the Desert give?
United Way of the Desert reported 11 itemized grants totaling $124,651, out of $226,901 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 16 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does United Way of the Desert fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (33%), Food & Nutrition (24%), Youth Development (23%).
Who are United Way of the Desert's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Family YMCA of the Desert ($163k), Boys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley ($146k), Jewish Family Service of the Desert ($134k).
Does United Way of the Desert fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 9% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as United Way of the Desert?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc, Regional Access Project Foundation, Inland Empire Community Foundation.
Where is United Way of the Desert based?
United Way of the Desert is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of the Desert’s filings →

More from the funding graph