Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Michels Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2017
27
Grants FY2017
9
States reached
$500
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Michels Family Foundation’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Santa Cruz County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year The Michels Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $6k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
17
1
18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Philanthropy$104kFood & Nutrition$1kReligion$880Education$835Environment$650International$420Housing & Shelter$350Science & Tech$300Other$0
02FY2017 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$500
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$500
HILL HAVURAH$480
Individual grant recipient$475
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$300
EUGENE WALDORF SCHOOL$300
EUGENE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$300
NATURE CONSERVANCY$250
HOMELESS SERVICES CENTER$250
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$220
NATURAL RECOURCES DEFINSE COUNCIL$200
350ORG$200
AMIGOS DE LA AMERICAS$200
MEALS ON WHEELS$200
GARRISON FOREST SCHOOL$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAPITOL HILL VILLAGE: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation Santa Cruz County and the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $103,580 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ COUNTYHILL HAVURAH — $880 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank — $500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $475 · OtherEUGENE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $300 · OtherHOUSING MATTERS — $250 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $250 · OtherAMIGOS DE LA AMERICAS — $200 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $200 · Other+8 more — $675 · OtherWALDORF EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $300 · EducationGARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC — $150 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $100 · EducationTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $300 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $220 · International350ORG — $200 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $200 · EnvironmentROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $100 · HealthPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC — $75 · Arts & CultureCAPITOL HILL VILLAGE — $50 · Human Services
Philanthropy$103,580Other$4,230Education$550International$520Environment$400Health$100Arts & Culture$75Human Services$50

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $103,580 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALDORF EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING MATTERS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budget350ORG — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION UNDERSTANDING OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIELD SCHOOL INC — $85 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITOL HILL VILLAGE — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Michels Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph