Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Michael and Sally Mayer Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$127kEducation$108kHealth$70kReligion$23kArts & Culture$11kRecreation & Sports$9kPublic Benefit$7kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN MATEO SERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$9,800
FAMILY CONNECTIONS$7,500
NAMI$7,500
HEART FOR HUMANITY$6,000
LYMELIGHT$5,000
FUND FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000
UC SAN DIEGO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL$4,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLINGAME$1,325
BOK RANCH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$85
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLINGAME: $13k → 7%HEART FOR HUMANITY: $6k → 8%THE URBAN PAW: $1k → 10%AMOR: $10k → 11%LL FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%FUND FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 12%JAZZ AT THE BALLROOM: $10k → 7%NAMI: $30k → 8%AMOR: $5k → 11%ROSE CITY PARK SCHOOL: $5k → 12%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLINGAME: $6k → 7%NAMI: $20k → 8%LYMELIGHT: $5k → 7%NAMI: $8k → 8%ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL: $48k → 10%UC SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%LYMELIGHT: $2k → 7%CENTRAL OFFICE: $5k → 8%ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL: $28k → 10%LYMELIGHT: $2k → 7%ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 10%LYMELIGHT: $2k → 7%ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 10%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLINGAME: $2k → 7%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLINGAME: $1k → 7%FOOD RUNNERS: $3k → 10%SERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSE: $17k → 7%SAN MATEO SERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 7%SERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 7%SAN MATEO COUNTY PARKS: $9k → 7%SERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSE: $3k → 7%SERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSE: $3k → 7%SOJOURN PROJECT: $5k → 7%CAL CLUB HOUSE: $16k → 7%CAL CLUB HOUSE: $10k → 7%FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $19k → 7%FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $8k → 7%FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $8k → 7%FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $5k → 7%SAN MATEO PAL: $22k → 7%SAN MATEO PAL: $12k → 7%SAN MATEO PAL: $10k → 7%CORA: $5k → 7%SERRA HS: $5k → 7%SAN MATEO PAL: $3k → 7%CORA: $2k → 7%SAN MATEO FELLOWSHIP: $1k → 7%FILOLI: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$378k · 17 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
23

Total granted

$378k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+61%

Still filing today

24%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPublic BenefitEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $39k · revenue +30%
  • CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse
    3× · 2020–2022 · $8k · revenue +46%
  • CR
    CONSUMER REPORTS INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $816 · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • JA
    Jazz at the Ballroom Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -51%
  • SM
    SAN MATEO COUNTY PARKS
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • LF
    LL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Bay Area Barns and Trails
Human Services
3
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

4
Sonoma Botanical Garden
5
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
6
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
7
350 Bay Area Action

Mission: We are building a grassroots climate movement in the Bay Area and beyond to eliminate carbon pollution and achieve a clean energy future with racial, economic, and environmental justice. Our vision is that all who live in the Bay…

Environment
8
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
9
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
11
Public Policy Institute of California

Inform and improve public policy in california through independent, objective, nonpartisan research

12
Transportation Alternatives for Marin
Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peninsula Family Connections and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL — $91,650 · OtherARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOLNAMI — $57,735 · OtherNAMIIndividual grant recipient — $47,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSE — $37,437 · OtherSERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSECAL CLUB HOUSE — $26,583 · OtherCAL CLUB HOUSEFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BURLINGAME — $21,397 · OtherAMOR — $15,200 · OtherSAN MATEO SERVICE LEAGUE HOPE HOUSE — $15,000 · Other+28 more — $92,238 · Other+28 morePENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS — $38,500 · HealthPENINSULA…Jazz at the Ballroom Inc — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $275 · Arts & CultureFUND FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $5,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $500 · Education+1 more — $120 · EducationPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $1,000 · EnvironmentPets In Need — $1,000 · AnimalsCONSUMER REPORTS INC — $816 · Public BenefitHuman Investment Project Inc — $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$404,240Health$38,500Arts & Culture$10,275Education$5,620Environment$1,000Animals$1,000Public Benefit$816Housing & Shelter$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS — $38,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJazz at the Ballroom Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse — $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFUND FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD RUNNERS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOK RANCH INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPets In Need — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS CREEK — $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC — $816 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Investment Project Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLER AVIATION INSTITUTE — $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVannoy Parent Club — $120 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS
  • Who funds Jazz at the Ballroom Inc
  • Who funds CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse
  • Who funds FUND FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds FOOD RUNNERS
  • Who funds BOK RANCH INC
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST
  • Who funds Pets In Need
  • Who funds CARITAS CREEK
  • Who funds CONSUMER REPORTS INC
  • Who funds Human Investment Project Inc
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA20.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Atkinson Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Michael and Sally Mayer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Michael and Sally Mayer Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Michael and Sally Mayer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph