Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michael and Rebecca Vest Founda

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$316kEnvironment$315kInternational$234kHealth$187kFood & Nutrition$126kEducation$123kHuman Services$65kHousing & Shelter$63kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $263k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEVA FOUNDATION$30,000
NRDC$25,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE FUND$25,000
THE PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES$23,000
FRIENDS OF RANCHO SAN PEDRO$20,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$15,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$15,000
NEW ROADS SCHOOL$15,000
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
WESTSIDE FOOD BANK$10,000
RAINFOREST ACTION NETWORK$10,000
HEAL THE BAY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES: $37k → 10%WOMEN OF WORTH: $3k → 11%THE PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES: $23k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
VA
NM
TN
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 32 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
14

Total granted

$1.4M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+10%

Still filing today

63%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $145k · revenue +41%
  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +110%
  • NR
    NEW ROADS SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • PM
    PANDION MUSIC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +56% · 97% of their budget
  • HP
    HIGHLAND PARK HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
Physicians for Social Responsibility

Psr-la is a physician and health advocate membership organization working to protect public health from nuclear threats and environmental toxins.

International
7
New Media Ventures

We believe that by changing where capital is invested, we can shift the structures of power to benefit more people.

Public Benefit
8
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
9
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
10
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
11
Newfilmmakers Los Angeles

Works by emerging filmmkaers from around the world, providing the losangeles community of entertainment professionals and film goers with aconstant surge of monthly screening events. nfmla provides a forumwhere filmmakers can be recognized…

Arts & Culture
12
San Francisco Green Film Festival

San Francisco Green Film Festival's (SFGFF) mission is to educate and connect communities through forward thinking programs of environmental films, dialogues, and action opportunities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Rancho San Pedro. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $62,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $60,104 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $45,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE FUND: $45,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE FUNDMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,000 · OtherWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $41,000 · OtherWESTSIDE FOOD BANKHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $35,000 · OtherHOMEBOY INDUSTRIESHooves & Paws Animal Rescue Inc: $25,000 · Other+15 more: $91,550 · Other+15 morePANDION MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · Arts & CulturePANDION MUSIC FOUNDAT…BARNSDALL ARTS: $60,000 · Arts & CultureBARNSDALL ARTSFriends of Rancho San Pedro: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFriends of Rancho San…SONGWRITINGWITHINC: $13,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $19,500 · Arts & Culture+4 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $145,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES …HEAL THE BAY: $60,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAYENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $48,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFE…Rainforest Action Network: $16,500 · EnvironmentRainforest Action …VENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $130,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY …PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $65,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL …PARASITES WITHOUT BORDERS INC: $20,000 · HealthPARASITES WITH…SEVA FOUNDATION: $170,000 · InternationalSEVA FOUNDATIO…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10,000 · InternationalNEW ROADS SCHOOL: $99,429 · EducationNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationPARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES: $60,400 · Human ServicesWOMEN OF WORTH: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$485,154Arts & Culture$317,500Environment$269,500Health$215,000International$214,000Education$110,429Human Services$62,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPANDION MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 97% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $145,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $130,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ROADS SCHOOL: $99,429 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $65,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES: $60,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetBARNSDALL ARTS: $60,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $48,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $41,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Rancho San Pedro: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHooves & Paws Animal Rescue Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPARASITES WITHOUT BORDERS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $16,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOff The Mat Into The World DBA OTM Off the Mat: $15,250 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetSONGWRITINGWITHINC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVIDEO PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW EARTH ORGANIZATION: $6,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN OF WORTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFund for Sustainable Tomorrows: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWILDAID INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMicrobeTV Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPenny Lane Centers: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES DRAMA CLUB INC: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PANDION MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ROADS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds BARNSDALL ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Rancho San Pedro ↗
  • Who funds Hooves & Paws Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARASITES WITHOUT BORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Rainforest Action Network ↗
  • Who funds Off The Mat Into The World DBA OTM Off the Mat ↗
  • Who funds SONGWRITINGWITHINC ↗
  • Who funds VIDEO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW EARTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN OF WORTH ↗
  • Who funds Fund for Sustainable Tomorrows ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA13.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michael and Rebecca Vest Founda funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michael and Rebecca Vest Founda. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Michael and Rebecca Vest Founda?

Find your warmest path to The Michael and Rebecca Vest Founda through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael and Rebecca Vest Founda’s filings →

More from the funding graph