Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Micah Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$47kEnvironment$30kReligion$22kHealth$17kHuman Services$16kHousing & Shelter$12kInternational$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUTEKEDZA SECONDARY SCHOOL$3,520
HELP THE HOMLESS SOMERSET KY$2,400
COMMUNITY CARE FELLOWSHIP$2,000
WORLD VISION$1,872
PULASKI COUNTY KY SHERIFF SHOP$1,500
BAREFOOT REPUBLIC$1,200
WHITE LILY VOLUN FIRE DEPT$1,000
GOD'S FOOD PANTRY$1,000
NEW LIFE CHURCH$515
BRIDGE MINISTRY$275
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 57% of grant dollars ($103k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 43% that went abroad ($76k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $15k → 9%INTEGRATED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 35%FOR OTHERS: $3k → 4%LIVING BREAD SOUP KITCHEN: $1k → 19%PEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CA
CO
KY
WV
MD
TN
TX

Beyond the US: 43% of all-years giving ($76k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Zimbabwe$76k · 10 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$119k · 7 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
28

Total granted

$119k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+79%

Still filing today

14%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MUTEKEDZA SECONDARY SCHOOL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $65k
  • CH
    CLAY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
    4× · 2019–2024 · $13k
  • MS
    MASIKANA SECONDARY SCHOOL
    3× · 2019–2021 · $11k

Funded once

  • MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +521%
  • GD
    GLOBAL DEVEL GROUPAFRICAN BUSH CAM
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • FO
    FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Living Water Missions International

To operate exclusively for charitable purposes, specifically to relieve the poor, distressed, and underprivileged by providing free nutritious food, meals and essential resources to individuals and families experiencing homelessness or…

International
2
Christlike Ministries Inc

Ministering to the homeless

Crime & Legal
3
Iglesia Cristiana Tiempos de Restauracion

Religious organization

Religion
4
Everything Laid Down Ministries

To give the gospel of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to the poor and dejected of the world. We do this by caring for widows, orphans, and broken people around the world. We care for hem by feeding, clothing, and encouraging them in Jesus by His…

Religion
5
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
6
God Feeds Ministry

Provide fresh produce to those in need

Food & Nutrition
7
The Church Without Walls Global Reach

To impact, inspire and heal communities and world through God's love.

Religion
8
Liberty Ministry International Inc

Our mission is to liberate souls

Religion
9
What Matters Ministries and Missions

The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.

Religion
10
Broken Wall Ministries

To preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ and to minister to orphans and sick children in various countries as well as to provide orphan care and adoption assistance to families throughout the world.

Human Services
11
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
12
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barefoot Republic Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Catch Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUTEKEDZA SECONDARY SCHOOL: $65,221 · OtherMUTEKEDZA SECONDARY SCHOOLCLAY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH: $12,500 · OtherCLAY HILL BAPTIST CHURCHMASIKANA SECONDARY SCHOOL: $10,931 · OtherMASIKANA SECONDARY SCHOOLCOMMUNITY CARE FELLOWSHIP: $9,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CARE FELLOWSHIPHELP THE HOMLESS SOMERSET KY: $8,000 · OtherHELP THE HOMLESS SOMERSET KYGLOBAL DEVEL GROUPAFRICAN BUSH CAM: $5,000 · Other+26 more: $31,222 · Other+26 moreMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT …FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesFOR OTHERS CO…INTEGRATED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesINTEGRATED CO…PEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $1,000 · Human ServicesLIVING BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesBAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC: $9,200 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD VISION INC: $4,836 · InternationalFree the Oppressed: $500 · InternationalThe Catch Ministry Inc: $1,000 · Religion
Other$141,874Human Services$21,500Youth Development$9,200International$5,336Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC: $9,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $4,836 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Catch Ministry Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetFree the Oppressed: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SILOAM HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds The Catch Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds LIVING BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Free the Oppressed ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Micah Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Micah Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Micah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph