Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McR Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$50kYouth Development$50kFood & Nutrition$36kArts & Culture$31kReligion$30kCivil Rights$9kHousing & Shelter$9kHuman Services$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH JACOB$9,000
CONCORD HOSPITAL TRUST$5,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
CONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS$3,000
CURRIER MUSEUM OF ART$3,000
APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB$3,000
NH HUNGER SOLUTIONS$3,000
CAPITAL REGION FOOD BANK$3,000
RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$3,000
CONCORD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$3,000
FRIENDLY KITCHEN$3,000
ADVENTURE FOR ALL$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
WOMENADE OF CONCORD$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADVENTURE FOR ALL: $3k → 9%ADVENTURE FOR ALL: $3k → 9%ADVENTURE FOR ALL: $3k → 9%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $2k → 7%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $2k → 7%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $2k → 7%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $1k → 7%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 24 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
3

Total granted

$290k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+165%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Concord Hospital Trust
    5× · 2020–2024 · $19k · revenue +102%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +120%
  • RC
    RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN RAIL TRAILgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +165%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
3
Cross New Hampshire Adventure Trail

Recreational trail development, use and maintenance

Recreation & Sports
4
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
5
Friends of the Concord - Lake Sunapee Rail Trail

The mission of the Friends of the Concord - Lake Sunapee Rail Trail is to build and maintain a 34 mile multi-use trail through the municipalities of Concord, Hopkinton, Warner, Sutton, Bradford and Newbury.

Environment
6
New Hampshire Rivers Council

Conservation of new hampshire rivers

Environment
7
Mt Ascutney Outdoors Inc

Mt. Ascutney Outdoors, Inc's mission is to promote vitality within the community by providing affordable and unique recreational, cultural and educational activities to local residents and visitors from the Upper Valley region of Vermont…

Recreation & Sports
8
Concord Hospital Inc

Concord Hospital is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

Health
9
Friends of the Music Hall

The Music Hall (TMH) is a community-supported, nonprofit live entertainment venue with acclaimed film, music, theater, literary, and dance performances in two theaters in downtown Portsmouth, NH. Its 900-seat Historic Theater, built in…

Arts & Culture
10
Squannacook Greenways

Squannacook Greenways' goal is to build, maintain, and promote the Squannacook River Rail Trail (SRRT) as a source of recreation and safe non-motorized transportation. The Squannacook River Rail Trail is a proposed conversion of…

Recreation & Sports
11
Actors Company of Natick

The Actors Company of Natick ACON creates theatre with purpose. At ACON, we celebrate artists and challenge community perspectives through equitable, professional and accessible productions.

Arts & Culture
12
Concord Housing Foundation Inc

Support diverse affordable housing in Concord, Massachusetts for people of low and moderate income in a manner intended to advance the public good.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverbend Community Mental Health; the most unlike its peers is Canterbury Shaker Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONCORD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $50,000 · OtherCONCORD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTemple Beth Jacob: $27,000 · OtherTemple Beth JacobIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC: $13,500 · OtherTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INCRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $13,000 · OtherRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTHCAPITAL REGION FOOD BANK: $13,000 · OtherCAPITAL REGION FOOD BANKPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10,000 · OtherNHPR: $10,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $9,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF NH: $7,500 · Other+9 more: $24,750 · Other+9 moreCONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $9,000 · Human ServicesCONCORD C…Adventure for All Corporation: $8,000 · Human ServicesAdventure…WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $8,000 · Human ServicesWOMENADE …Concord Hospital Trust: $19,000 · HealthRED RIVER THEATRES INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureCommunity Gallery Inc: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureKIMBALL JENKINS INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE HUNGER SOLUTIONS INC: $9,000 · Civil RightsAppalachian Mountain Club: $6,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN RAIL TRAIL: $500 · Community Improvement
Other$221,750Human Services$25,000Health$19,000Arts & Culture$18,000Civil Rights$9,000Environment$6,000Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConcord Hospital Trust: $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRED RIVER THEATRES INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE HUNGER SOLUTIONS INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAdventure for All Corporation: $8,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWOMENADE OF CONCORD: $8,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Gallery Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIMBALL JENKINS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN RAIL TRAIL: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Concord Hospital Trust ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds RED RIVER THEATRES INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE HUNGER SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Adventure for All Corporation ↗
  • Who funds WOMENADE OF CONCORD ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds Community Gallery Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds KIMBALL JENKINS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN RAIL TRAIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH27.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McR Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McR Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The McR Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The McR Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McR’s filings →

More from the funding graph