Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The McR Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$50kYouth Development$50kFood & Nutrition$36kArts & Culture$31kReligion$30kCivil Rights$9kHousing & Shelter$9kHuman Services$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH JACOB$9,000
CONCORD HOSPITAL TRUST$5,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
NH HUNGER SOLUTIONS$3,000
CONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS$3,000
ADVENTURE FOR ALL$3,000
APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB$3,000
RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$3,000
CONCORD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$3,000
FRIENDLY KITCHEN$3,000
CURRIER MUSEUM OF ART$3,000
CAPITAL REGION FOOD BANK$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
AVA GALLERY & ART CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADVENTURE FOR ALL: $3k → 9%ADVENTURE FOR ALL: $3k → 9%ADVENTURE FOR ALL: $3k → 9%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $2k → 7%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $2k → 7%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $2k → 7%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $1k → 7%WOMENADE OF CONCORD: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$290k · 24 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
3

Total granted

$290k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+165%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Concord Hospital Trust
    5× · 2020–2024 · $19k · revenue +38%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +120%
  • RC
    RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN RAIL TRAILgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +165%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
3
Cross New Hampshire Adventure Trail

Recreational trail development, use and maintenance

Recreation & Sports
4
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
5
Friends of the Concord - Lake Sunapee Rail Trail

The mission of the Friends of the Concord - Lake Sunapee Rail Trail is to build and maintain a 34 mile multi-use trail through the municipalities of Concord, Hopkinton, Warner, Sutton, Bradford and Newbury.

Environment
6
New Hampshire Rivers Council

Conservation of new hampshire rivers

Environment
7
Mt Ascutney Outdoors Inc

Mt. Ascutney Outdoors, Inc's mission is to promote vitality within the community by providing affordable and unique recreational, cultural and educational activities to local residents and visitors from the Upper Valley region of Vermont…

Recreation & Sports
8
Concord Hospital Inc

Concord Hospital is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

Health
9
Friends of the Music Hall

The Music Hall (TMH) is a community-supported, nonprofit live entertainment venue with acclaimed film, music, theater, literary, and dance performances in two theaters in downtown Portsmouth, NH. Its 900-seat Historic Theater, built in…

Arts & Culture
10
Squannacook Greenways

Squannacook Greenways' goal is to build, maintain, and promote the Squannacook River Rail Trail (SRRT) as a source of recreation and safe non-motorized transportation. The Squannacook River Rail Trail is a proposed conversion of…

Recreation & Sports
11
Actors Company of Natick

The Actors Company of Natick ACON creates theatre with purpose. At ACON, we celebrate artists and challenge community perspectives through equitable, professional and accessible productions.

Arts & Culture
12
Concord Housing Foundation Inc

Support diverse affordable housing in Concord, Massachusetts for people of low and moderate income in a manner intended to advance the public good.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverbend Community Mental Health and the most unlike its peers is Canterbury Shaker Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONCORD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $50,000 · OtherCONCORD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBIndividual grant recipient — $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTemple Beth Jacob — $27,000 · OtherTemple Beth JacobIndividual grant recipient — $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC — $13,500 · OtherTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INCRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH — $13,000 · OtherRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTHCAPITAL REGION FOOD BANK — $13,000 · OtherCAPITAL REGION FOOD BANKPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $10,000 · OtherNHPR — $10,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $9,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF NH — $7,500 · Other+9 more — $24,750 · Other+9 moreCONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $9,000 · Human ServicesCONCORD C…Adventure for All Corporation — $8,000 · Human ServicesAdventure…WOMENADE OF CONCORD — $8,000 · Human ServicesWOMENADE …Concord Hospital Trust — $19,000 · HealthRED RIVER THEATRES INC — $13,000 · Arts & CultureCommunity Gallery Inc — $2,000 · Arts & CultureCANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureKIMBALL JENKINS INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE HUNGER SOLUTIONS INC — $9,000 · Civil RightsAppalachian Mountain Club — $6,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN RAIL TRAIL — $500 · Community Improvement
Other$221,750Human Services$25,000Health$19,000Arts & Culture$18,000Civil Rights$9,000Environment$6,000Community Improvement$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetConcord Hospital Trust — $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC — $13,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH — $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRED RIVER THEATRES INC — $13,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE HUNGER SOLUTIONS INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAdventure for All Corporation — $8,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWOMENADE OF CONCORD — $8,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Gallery Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIMBALL JENKINS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN RAIL TRAIL — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Concord Hospital Trust
  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH
  • Who funds RED RIVER THEATRES INC
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE HUNGER SOLUTIONS INC
  • Who funds CONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS
  • Who funds Adventure for All Corporation
  • Who funds WOMENADE OF CONCORD
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club
  • Who funds Community Gallery Inc
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds KIMBALL JENKINS INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN RAIL TRAIL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH27.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The McR Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Appalachian Mountain Club1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The McR Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The McR Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph