Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McLelland Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$5.8MEducation$1.6MHousing & Shelter$565kFood & Nutrition$490kYouth Development$410kHuman Services$253kReligion$210kRecreation & Sports$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $480k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$750,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$250,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$75,000
HOME OF THE SPARROW$55,000
MANNA ON MAIN ST$50,000
TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY$50,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL$50,000
CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK$50,000
PHILABUNDANCE$50,000
YMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE$25,000
PLAYWORKS$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PHILA$20,000
SANCTUARY FARM PHILADELPHIA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $468k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY: $75k → 7%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $5k → 11%GIRLS WHO CODE: $13k → 17%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY: $50k → 7%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $5k → 11%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY: $35k → 7%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $5k → 11%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY: $25k → 7%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $5k → 11%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY: $25k → 7%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $5k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE: $50k → 6%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY: $25k → 7%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $5k → 11%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY: $25k → 7%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $5k → 11%TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF NASSAU COUNTY: $25k → 7%YMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE: $25k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE: $25k → 6%JOURNEY HOME: $5k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $5k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $5k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $5k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $5k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $5k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.6M · 28 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
4

Total granted

$9.6M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+27%

Still filing today

61%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $270k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +124%
  • PH
    PENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW
    8× · 2017–2025 · $530k · revenue +106%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $305k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • UT
    UNIFIED THEATRE
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • I
    IDAAY
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • GIRLS WHO CODE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Scholarship Fund Philadelphia

With over 20 years of experience and over 30,000 scholarships awarded, csfp provides philadelphia children with eight-year, needs-based scholarships to attend safe, quality, k-8th grade schools. continued on schedule o.supporting…

Education
2
Connecticut Foodshare Inc

The mission of the connecticut foodshare is to deliver an informed and equitable response to hunger by mobilizing community partners, volunteers, and supporters.

—
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
7
Connecticut Council for Philanthropy

Ccp organizes, inspires, and equips a community of funders to learn, collaborate, and lead together for sustained impact and social change in connecticut.

Philanthropy
8
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

Connecticut public broadcasting, inc. will inform, educate and inspire the people of connecticut, connecting and empowering the people of ct through outstanding journalism, storytelling, education and experiences, to make our state a more…

Arts & Culture
9
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

—
10
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
11
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NURSING: $3,002,344 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NURSINGMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT: $500,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENTREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $500,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANIndividual grant recipient: $300,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan: $250,000 · OtherMANNA ON MAIN ST: $210,000 · OtherPLAYWORKS: $195,000 · Other+13 more: $808,500 · Other+13 moreCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $1,952,607 · HealthCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS I…PENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW: $530,000 · Food & NutritionPENNSYLVANI…Philabundance: $215,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundan…CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $215,000 · Food & NutritionCHESTER COU…+1 more: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL: $305,000 · EducationKIPP PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL: $170,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN IN NASSAU COUNTY INC: $285,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $35,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOME INC: $35,000 · Human Services+1 more: $12,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC: $95,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$5,765,844Health$1,952,607Food & Nutrition$970,000Education$485,000Human Services$467,500Youth Development$150,000Recreation & Sports$95,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $1,952,607 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW: $530,000 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL: $305,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN IN NASSAU COUNTY INC: $285,000 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $250,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetPhilabundance: $215,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $215,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetKIPP PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL: $170,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetJ WOOD PLATT CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP TRUST: $136,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC: $95,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTHE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC: $70,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetFOODSHARE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetShe Leads Justice Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANA GRACE PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN IN NASSAU COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds KIPP PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NASSAU COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds J WOOD PLATT CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP TRUST ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds She Leads Justice Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FARM PHILA ↗
  • Who funds THE ANA GRACE PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Farmington Bank Community Foundation IncCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Philadelphia Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Sandra & Arnold Chase Family Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McLelland Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McLelland Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 50%
  • The Bridge Family Center Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Journey Home Inc: 59% of income from government
  • The Village for Families and Children: 50% of income from government
  • The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc: 49% of income from government
  • She Leads Justice Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The McLelland Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The McLelland Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McLelland Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph