Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McKeen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$222k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$352kHealth$145kArts & Culture$111kEducation$51kFood & Nutrition$50kCivil Rights$20kHuman Services$18kPhilanthropy$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIRK IN THE HILLS$50,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE$20,000
PROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE$20,000
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC$20,000
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC$10,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$10,000
WILLIAM J BRENNAN JR CENTER FOR JUSTICE$10,000
EVERY MOTHER COUNTS$10,000
PRO PUBLICA INC$10,000
AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN$10,000
ELECTRIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION INC$10,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC$10,000
OAKLAND HOPE$10,000
PEN AMERICA$10,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN: $4k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN: $4k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN: $4k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN: $4k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607k · 14 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +134% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$607k
$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+32%

Still filing today

36%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    8× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +202%
  • PV
    Presbyterian Villages of Michigan
    5× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +277%
  • TV
    THE VILLAGE CLUB FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • MA
    MANCHESTER AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

—
2
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
5
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
6
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
7
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
8
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
9
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan

Freedom, equality, and justicethe bill of rights declared that we have rights and liberties that the government shouldn't interfere with. rights like the freedom of speech and our right to a speedy trial that are the cornerstone of our…

—
11
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Every Mother Counts; the most unlike its peers is Manchester Area Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIRK IN THE HILLS: $313,850 · OtherKIRK IN THE HILLSUniversity of Michigan: $98,500 · OtherUniversity of MichiganMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $31,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYPROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE: $20,000 · Other+9 more: $54,000 · Other+9 moreDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $84,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY…PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePEN AMERICAN CEN…PRO PUBLICA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INCMATRIX THEATRE COMPANY: $4,500 · Arts & CultureGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionOAKLAND HOPE: $10,000 · Food & NutritionHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $12,000 · HealthEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $10,000 · HealthAUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN: $10,000 · HealthUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $10,000 · HealthPresbyterian Villages of Michigan: $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE CLUB FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropyWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $10,000 · EducationSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$517,350Arts & Culture$108,500Food & Nutrition$50,000Health$42,000Human Services$18,000Philanthropy$12,000Education$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $98,500 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $84,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresbyterian Villages of Michigan: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE CLUB FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATRIX THEATRE COMPANY: $4,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Presbyterian Villages of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MOTHER COUNTS ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND HOPE ↗
  • Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MATRIX THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McKeen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McKeen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The McKeen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The McKeen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McKeen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph