· Private foundation
The McCune Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k91 grants · $181k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $854k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $310k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FUND FOR SANTA BARBARA | $60,000 |
| CAUSE (CENTRAL COAST ALLIANCE UNITED FOR A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY) | $50,000 |
| FUTURE LEADERS OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| CAUSE (CENTRAL COAST ALLIANCE UNITED FOR A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY) | $50,000 |
| MIXTECOINDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT | $50,000 |
| FUTURE LEADERS OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC | $45,000 |
| FUND FOR SANTA BARBARA | $40,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY | $40,000 |
| GIRLS INC CARPINTERIA | $35,000 |
| CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY | $35,000 |
| BUEN VECINO | $35,000 |
| CAUSE (CENTRAL COAST ALLIANCE UNITED FOR A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY) | $30,000 |
| ONE STEP A LA VEZ | $30,000 |
| THE ARC OF VENTURA COUNTY | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $461k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
108 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FLFuture Leaders of America9× · 2017–2025 · $804k · revenue +935%
FUND FOR SANTA BARBARA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $568k · revenue +134%
MIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT9× · 2017–2025 · $410k · revenue +231%
Funded once
NEO Philanthropy Incone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +1%- FSFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTYone grant, 2024 · $41k · revenue -10%
- GKGuadalupe Kids Come First Foundationone grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue -12% · 27% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Active San Gabriel Valley (ActiveSGV) is a community-based environmental advocacy and public health non-profit organization. Our mission is to promote a more sustainable, equitable, and livable San Gabriel Valley.
California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…
Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools
Institute of Public Strategies (IPS) is a nonprofit corporation that receives its funding from local and federal governmental agencies and private foundations, through long-term grants or contracts to provide community-level services…
The budget center provides dependable, timely, policy guidance and public education through our independent research and analysis, public education, strategic collaborations, and communications to expand economic opportunities and promote…
CAUSE's mission is to build grassroots power to realize social, economic and environmental justice for the people of the Central Coast Region through policy research, leadership development, organizing and advocacy.
California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.
Statewide voice for pedestrian safety and healthy, walkable communities for people of all ages and abilities. California Walks partners with state agencies, community-based organizations and residents.
Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Corazon Latino. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
203 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 203 of the 260 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Future Leaders of America ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR SANTA BARBARA INC ↗
- Who funds MIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Just Communities Central Coast ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
- Who funds One Step A La Vez ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF VENTURA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA BICYCLE COALITION DBA MOVE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Leading from Within ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM 4 YOUTH ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES ACT ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND FOR VENTURA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TRANSITIONSMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUEN VECINO ↗
- Who funds Pesticide Action Network North America ↗
- Who funds ENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION ↗
- Who funds ONE COMMUNITY ACTION OF SANTA MARIA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE FIRST REPLACING OIL & GAS ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORP ↗
- Who funds CUYAMA VALLEY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CULTURAL AND CREATIVE ARTS CENTER OF THE SMV ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRITO FAMILY LEARNING CENTERS ↗
- Who funds THE LITTLE HOUSE BY THE PARK CO FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ACTION NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fund for Santa Barbara Inc · Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Ventura County Community Foundation · James S Bower Foundation · Towbes Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · Edwin and Jeanne Woods Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The McCune Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Capaces Leadership Institute — 20% of income from government
- Family Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.