Skip to content
The McCart Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The McCart Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$402k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$460kHealth$228kHuman Services$189kEnvironment$132kPublic Safety & Disaster$125kReligion$38kEmployment$30kPublic Benefit$21kOther$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UGA FOUNDATION$150,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTH LOUISIANA$60,000
THE BOYCE ANSLEY SCHOOL$50,000
KATE'S CLUB$45,000
BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC$25,000
STURGEON CITY ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER$15,000
SHEPHERD CENTER$15,000
GICIA - GASPARILLA ISLAND CONSERVATION & IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION$10,000
GEORGIA CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY$10,000
AMEN HOUSE INC$8,000
JOHANN FUST LIBRARY FOUNDATION$6,575
FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE$5,000
BLENHEIM PALACE FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE HEALS: $20k → 13%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES: $15k → 22%HOPE'S PLACE: $47k → 18%GEORGIA CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY: $10k → 13%THRIVE COMMUNITY: $15k → 13%KATE'S CLUB: $45k → 14%PROMISE 686: $27k → 9%THRIVE COMMUNITY: $10k → 13%KATE'S CLUB: $25k → 14%KATE'S CLUB: $10k → 14%THRIVE COMMUNITY: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 15 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

$1.4M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
0%

Still filing today

73%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2023–2026 · $410k · revenue +43%
  • TB
    THE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2023–2026 · $150k · revenue +76%
  • BG
    BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $125k · revenue +209%

Funded once

  • HP
    HOPE'S PLACE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $47k · revenue +12%
  • PI
    Promise686 Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $27k · revenue +91%
  • CL
    CHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER OF KENTUCKY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +167%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Agape Inc

Georgia agape's mission is to provide professional social services as a compassionate christian outreach to children and families in order to enhance their prospects for a better and brighter future.

—
2
Hope Harbor Inc

Hope Harbor offers an immersive family reconciliation program designed to give your family the tools and support you need to navigate the storm, so you can enjoy peace and hope in your home. Hope Harbor serves adolescents and their…

Human Services
3
Hope Atlanta Inc

Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.

—
4
Hope Haven Association Inc

Hope haven's multi-disciplinary team provides excellence in educational, psychological and related therapeutic services for children, families and young adults with special needs.

Health
5
Hope Center for Children

Hope center for children's mission is to build stable, healthy families in the upstate of sc by providing a safe place from abuse and neglect.

—
6
Hope Haven of Dekalb County Inc

To provide shelter, food, and supportive services to homeless individuals and families of DeKalb County, and to advocate for the rights of homeless individuals and families.

Housing & Shelter
7
The House of Hope Inc

House of hope's mission is to provide the tools to achieve recovery from addiction and address mental health issues while transforming lives, families and communities. house of hope provides hope for the future and healing to those in need…

Health
8
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
9
Lifegate Counseling Center At Peachtree Inc

At lifegate counseling center at peachtree, our vision is to foster an environment in which lives are transformed, relationships are reconciled and hope is found. we offer a vast array of faith-sensitive physotherapeutic services and…

Health
10
Kidspeace National Centers of Georgia

Kidspeace, founded in 1882, is a healthcare nonprofit that is dedicated to providing hope, help, and healing to children, adults, and those who love them.continued on schedule o.with 40 offices and facilities across seven states, this…

Human Services
11
Grace Centers of Hope

Our mission is to positively change the lives of the homeless, addicted and unwanted through the gospel of jesus christ, personal accountability, life skills, education, and work-related programs. grace centers of hope's most significant…

—
12
Grace Counseling Inc

To provide counseling, psychiatric, educational and consultation services to individuals, families, churches, religious organizations and businesses. grace counseling, inc. is a christian counseling center offering excellence in a full…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southern Highlands Reserve Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $410,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATIONTHE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC: $150,000 · EducationTHE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INCHOPE Inc Helping Other People be Empowered: $40,000 · EducationHOPE Inc Helping Other People be Empowered+1 more: $20,000 · EducationVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $185,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INCGICIA - GASPARILLA ISLAND CONSERVATION & IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherGICIA - GASPARILLA ISLAND CONS…AMEN HOUSE INC: $48,000 · OtherAMEN HOUSE INCHUB URBAN MINISTRY: $38,000 · OtherHUB URBAN MINISTRYFRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE: $25,750 · OtherFRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDERONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NORTH LOUISIANA & ARKANSAS: $20,000 · OtherSHREVEPORT GREEN: $17,000 · OtherACHIEVING RECOVERY TOGETHER INC: $16,098 · OtherEASE - EDUCATING ALL STUDENTS WITH EXCELLENCE: $15,000 · OtherSTURGEON CITY ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER: $15,000 · Other+2 more: $9,075 · OtherBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $125,000 · HealthBOCA GRANDE HEAL…RECOVERY CAFE LEXINGTON INC: $69,755 · HealthRECOVERY CAFE LE…LEKOTEK OF GEORGIA INC: $25,000 · HealthLEKOTEK OF GEORG…SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $15,000 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTER …KATE'S CLUB INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesKATE'S CLUB INCHOPE'S PLACE INC: $46,550 · Human ServicesHOPE'S PLACE IN…THRIVE COMMUNITY INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHRIVE COMMUNIT…Promise686 Inc: $27,000 · Human ServicesPromise686 IncHope Heals Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesHope Heals IncHOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I: $15,000 · Human ServicesHOLY ANGELS RES…GEORGIA CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESERVE INC: $75,000 · EnvironmentCHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER OF KENTUCKY INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentWilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Education$620,000Other$438,923Health$234,755Human Services$228,550Environment$75,000Youth Development$25,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $410,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC: $150,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetKATE'S CLUB INC: $80,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESERVE INC: $75,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetRECOVERY CAFE LEXINGTON INC: $69,755 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetAMEN HOUSE INC: $48,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE'S PLACE INC: $46,550 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHOPE Inc Helping Other People be Empowered: $40,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHRIVE COMMUNITY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetPromise686 Inc: $27,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER OF KENTUCKY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetLEKOTEK OF GEORGIA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHope Heals Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetODYSSEY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSHREVEPORT GREEN: $17,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetACHIEVING RECOVERY TOGETHER INC: $16,098 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Raymond James Charita…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McCart Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McCart Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McCart Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home