Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McAllister Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$111kEducation$105kHuman Services$39kReligion$30kRecreation & Sports$29kHealth$20kYouth Development$10kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$29,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$29,000
PAWS N CLAWS ANIMAL SHELTER INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%YMCA CAMP TECUMSUH: $20k → 9%YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $31k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$334k · 3 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$334k
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+19%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $118k
  • FF
    FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $111k · revenue +7%
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $105k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE
    one grant, 2020 · $31k · revenue -26%
  • SO
    SEEDS OF HOPE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • WC
    WABASH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lafayette Work Center Inc

The mission of lafayette industries is to provide meaningful employment opportunities to persons with developmental disabilities and to persons with other disabilities who are 18 years or older.

Employment
2
Lafayette General Foundation Inc

The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…

Health
3
Tecumseh Area Partnership Inc

Employment and training services

Employment
4
Greater Laporte Chamber of Commerce Inc

Chamber of commerce for laporte, indiana

—
5
West Lafayette Parks and Recreation Foundation Inc

To solicit, receive, and provide funds and/or property, and to receive gifts, bequests, and memorials for securing, maintaining, and informing the public about facilities and programs provided by the parks and recreation department of the…

Recreation & Sports
6
Family Ymca of Fayette County

The family ymca of fayette county offers various programs provided to promote christian values, health enhancement, family enrichment, and leadership development in youth and adults.

Human Services
7
Lafayette General Health System Inc

The organization was organized for the benefit and support of its related 501(c)(3) health care entities which provide medical care to restore, maintain and improve the health of the community in which it serves.

Health
8
Lafayette General Medical Center Inc

To restore, maintain, and imprive health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
Niches Land Trust Inc

Niches protects, restores and sustains northern indiana's ecosystems by providing habitat for native species and offering natural places for the education, appreciation and enjoyment of current and future generations.

Environment
10
Lafayette Industries North Inc

The mission of lafayette industries is to provide meaningful employment opportunities to persons with developmental disabilities and to persons with other disabilities who are 18 years or older.

Employment
11
Lafayette Christian School Inc

To educate and inspire this generation to impact the culture for christ. lcs operates an early learning center, discovery cottage, collaborative school, preschool, kindergarten, elementary, middle and high school. summer camps are offered.…

Education
12
Lafayette Urban Enterprise Associat

Direct enterprise zone activities and reinvestment in the city of lafayette, indiana.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ivy Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paws N Claws Animal Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $117,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEEDS OF HOPE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 · OtherSEEDS OF HOPE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES IN…SALVATION ARMY: $8,000 · Other+1 more: $250 · OtherFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $111,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INCIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION INCYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $31,300 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRI…WABASH CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWABASH CENTER INCYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesYMCA CAMP TECUMSE…LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · PhilanthropyLAFAYETTE TREE FUND INC: $5,450 · EnvironmentPAWS N CLAWS ANIMAL SHELTER: $4,000 · Animals
Other$155,750Food & Nutrition$111,000Education$105,000Human Services$71,300Youth Development$10,000Philanthropy$9,000Environment$5,450Animals$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $111,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $31,300 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWABASH CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister FoundationIN24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation · North Central Health Services Inc · James K and Mary Jo Risk Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Lafayette · Sia Foundation Inc · Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Bauer Family Resources Inc · The Scheumann Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McAllister Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McAllister Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The McAllister Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The McAllister Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McAllister’s filings →

    More from the funding graph