Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Scheumann Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$725k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$5.7MEducation$881kHuman Services$812kRecreation & Sports$802kReligion$348kAnimals$155kPhilanthropy$145kFood & Nutrition$137kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $495k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$200,000
SALVATION ARMY$145,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$75,000
LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION$75,000
LAFAYETTE FAMILY YMCA$35,000
LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY$35,000
NORTHEND COMMUNITY CENTER$30,000
O'CONNOR HOUSE$25,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$20,000
ASSET INC DBA IMAGINATION STATIO$20,000
WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
L & A PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
LAFAYETTE JEFFERSON CHOIR BOOSTERS$10,000
OUT RUN THE SUN$10,000
INDIANAPOLIS ZOO$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $30k → 14%SHELTERING WINGS: $3k → 5%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%SHELTERING WINGS: $3k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS: $3k → 5%THE VILLAGES OF INDIANA: $25k → 16%THE VILLAGES OF INDIANA: $25k → 16%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 19%WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 19%WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 19%WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 19%WILLOWSTONE FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 19%WABASH CENTER: $1k → 19%WABASH CENTER: $1k → 19%WABASH CENTER: $1k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $35k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $12k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $5k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $4k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $3k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $3k → 19%LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY: $3k → 19%HEARTFORD HOUSE: $10k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $5k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $5k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $5k → 19%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $5k → 19%GROUP HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 34 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
17

Total granted

$4.6M
$5.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+22%

Still filing today

53%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Ball State University Foundation Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $189k · revenue +49%
  • FF
    FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $132k · revenue +48%
  • LU
    LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • FC
    FAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2017 · $5.0M · revenue -63% · 43% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laporte County Habitat for Humanity

The purpose of the organization is to build houses for families who are financially distressed. this is a local affiliate of habitat for humanity international.

2
Lifetime Housing Group Inc

Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

5
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
6
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
7
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
8
Humane Society for Hamilton County

Humane Society for Hamilton County (HSHC) is saving lives, educating communities and completing families by providing a compassionate and healthy environment for the homeless animals of Hamilton County, Indiana, until they can be placed…

Animals
9
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
10
Joliet Area Community Hospice Corp

The mission of the lightways hospice and serious illness care is to provide comprehensive, holistic, community based support services and care for terminally ill persons, their caregivers and loved ones without regard to economic status,…

Human Services
11
Glenburn Home Inc
Health
12
Greater Laporte Chamber of Commerce Inc

Chamber of commerce for laporte, indiana

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Villages of Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Long Center Inc Long Center for the Performing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%11%<5yr15%7%5–10yr16%14%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr22%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr15%0%5–10yr16%79%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr11%5%35–55yr22%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
15%
2,088/13,965

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $5,000,000 · Housing & ShelterFAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $677,000 · OtherRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $573,928 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYSALVATION ARMY — $479,800 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFAITH CHURCH — $285,000 · OtherFAITH CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $208,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $190,000 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · Other+29 more — $859,000 · Other+29 moreLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $685,000 · PhilanthropyTHE O'CONNOR HOUSE — $75,000 · Human ServicesLAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC — $62,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesThe Villages of Indiana Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesGroup Homes for Children Inc — $34,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES INC — $31,000 · Human ServicesCAREGIVER COMPANION INC — $20,000 · Human Services+3 more — $20,500 · Human ServicesBall State University Foundation Inc — $189,222 · EducationLAFAYETTE JEFFERSON CHOIR BOOSTERS INC — $15,000 · EducationFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC — $132,000 · Food & NutritionGreater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc — $42,100 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $5,000 · Food & NutritionHUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC — $100,000 · AnimalsIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc — $10,000 · AnimalsAlmost Home Humane Society Inc — $10,000 · Animals
Housing & Shelter$5,000,000Other$3,597,728Philanthropy$685,000Human Services$348,000Education$204,222Food & Nutrition$179,100Animals$120,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $5,000,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $685,000 over 9y, 39% of budgetBall State University Foundation Inc — $189,222 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC — $132,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE O'CONNOR HOUSE — $75,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetLAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC — $62,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUTRUN THE SUN INC — $55,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetThe Villages of Indiana Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc — $42,100 over 3y, 11% of budgetLong Center Inc Long Center for the Performing — $42,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetGroup Homes for Children Inc — $34,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC — $31,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGOLDEN BRONCHO CLUB INC — $27,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCommunity Cancer Network Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCAREGIVER COMPANION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetLAFAYETTE JEFFERSON CHOIR BOOSTERS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetAlmost Home Humane Society Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHeartford House Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWABASH CENTER INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetBOONE COUNTY CANCER SOCIETY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Ball State University Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER LAFAYETTE INC
  • Who funds THE O'CONNOR HOUSE
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE URBAN MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds OUTRUN THE SUN INC
  • Who funds The Villages of Indiana Inc
  • Who funds Greater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc
  • Who funds Long Center Inc Long Center for the Performing
  • Who funds Group Homes for Children Inc
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds GOLDEN BRONCHO CLUB INC
  • Who funds Community Cancer Network Inc
  • Who funds CAREGIVER COMPANION INC
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE JEFFERSON CHOIR BOOSTERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Lafayette Community FoundationIN30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Lafayette · Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation · Sia Foundation Inc · Coffin Family Foundation Inc · James K and Mary Jo Risk Family Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · North Central Health Services Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The McAllister Foundation · Arconic Foundation · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Scheumann Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph