Skip to content
The Mateo Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

The Mateo Family Foundation Inc

To provide monetary support via grantmaking to section 501(c)(3) organizations engaged in charitable, educational, scientific, literary or athletic activities.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$122kEducation$87kYouth Development$80kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$8k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $25,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $30,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY YOUTH RESOURCE BANK$15,000
THE NEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%SAM & DEVORAH FOUNDATION FOR TRANS YOUTH: $10k → 4%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%CORNELL FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 4 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$179k
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+14%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EARL MONROE NEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL CHARTER SCHOOL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $67k · revenue +84%
  • NR
    NEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +63%
  • SC
    SANTA CRUZ COUNTY YOUTH RESOURCE BANK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k

Funded once

  • Cornell University
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +14%
  • PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +25%
  • KN
    KIPP NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Brooklyn Nets & New York Liberty Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Nyc Impact Sports Inc

We aspire to expose existing and prospective athletes to competitive levels of volleyball and provide ambitious opportunities that fit interest, commitment, and budget levels. The experienced mentors and coaches of NYC Impact Sports are…

Youth Development
3
Brooklyn Youth Sports Club Inc

The purpose of the organization is to build an enriching educational setting for under-served brooklyn youth, using athletics as a vehicle to inspire them to fulfill their academic, physical, and personal potential. bkysc is driven by an…

Recreation & Sports
4
Nyc Youth Sports Organization Inc

To operate exclusively to empower and improve the lives of nyc youths by offering sports oriented programs in a positive environment as an alternative to street life. we look to inspire todays youth in the ideal of good sportmanship,…

Youth Development
5
New York Scores

To empower youth to lead healthy lives, be engaged students, and have the confidence and character to make a difference in the world.

Youth Development
6
King Hoops United

Empower the youth of new york city through basketball, providing them with academic enrichment, career development, and a strong sense of community to unlock their full potential

Youth Development
7
New Heights Youth Inc

To educate and empower promising underserved youth to be leaders, champions and student-athletes by developing the skills necessary for success in high school, college and life.

Youth Development
8
Yorkville Youth Athletic Association

The yorkville youth athletic association exists to serve the children of new york city. we seek to encourage positive attitudes and growth through teamwork and sportsmanship, attendance, fair play, respect for all, hard work, integrity and…

Youth Development
9
Cristo Rey New York High School

Cristo rey new york high school is a catholic, co-ed, college-prep school, part of the national cristo rey network. we serve students of all faiths who have demonstrated the potential and motivation to achieve success and who do not have…

Education
10
The City University of New York School of Law Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the law school in its mission to increase access to legal education to those from groups underrepresented in the profession and to prepare its graduates for public interest and public service practice.

Education
11
New Jersey Scholars Elite

New jersey scholars exists to help young adults and their families pursue excellence in all facets of their lives by using competitive basketball as a platform. this pursuit of excellence encompasses academics, citizenship and…

—
12
New York State West Youth Soccer Association

Promotion and development of good sportsmanship and fair play through the game of soccer by 1) teaching of soccer skills, and 2) to foster youth/amateur sports competition by promoting, developing, and governing youth soccer activities…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Renaissance Basketball Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Santa Cruz County Youth Resource Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EARL MONROE NEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL CHARTER SCHOOL: $67,000 · EducationEARL MONROE NEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL CH…Cornell University: $25,000 · EducationCornell UniversityKIPP NEW YORK INC: $20,000 · EducationKIPP NEW YORK INCNEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $46,500 · Recreation & SportsNEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL A…NEW YORK CITY JUNIOR VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsNEW YORK CITY JUNIOR VOLLEYB…DOWNTOWN GIANTS YOUTH FOOTBALL INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN GIANTS YOUTH FOOTBA…SANTA CRUZ COUNTY YOUTH RESOURCE BANK: $45,000 · OtherSANTA CRUZ COUNT…CORNELL FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCORNELL FOO…Sam & Devorah Foundation For Trans Youth: $10,000 · Human ServicesSam & Devor…PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACEPLAY…COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $10,000 · HealthCASA: $7,500 · Housing & Shelter
Education$112,000Recreation & Sports$76,500Other$45,000Human Services$30,000Youth Development$25,000Health$10,000Housing & Shelter$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEARL MONROE NEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL CHARTER SCHOOL: $67,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEW RENAISSANCE BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $46,500 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetSANTA CRUZ COUNTY YOUTH RESOURCE BANK: $45,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetCornell University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKIPP NEW YORK INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY JUNIOR VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN GIANTS YOUTH FOOTBALL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSam & Devorah Foundation For Trans Youth: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCASA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mateo Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mateo Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mateo Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home