Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Massey Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$383kReligion$324kHealth$267kInternational$136kPhilanthropy$95kRecreation & Sports$59kFood & Nutrition$41kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $139k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELTWAY BAPTIST CHURCH$28,835
NOAH PROJECT$20,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$15,000
LOVE & CARE MINISTRIES$15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$10,000
MIRATA-NEPAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN$10,000
NMDP$10,000
MIDCOAST CONSERVANCY$10,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$10,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRSTIAN ATHLETES$10,000
PREGNANCY RESOURCES OF ABILENE$7,100
PATHWAY TO VICTORY DR JEFFRESS 1ST BAPTIST DALLAS$5,585
WEST TEXAS REHAB CENTER$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY$5,000
RUIDOSO DOWNS CHAPLAINCY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $3k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $3k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $3k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $1k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $1k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $1k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $1k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $1k → 16%LOVE & CARE MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%LOVE & CARE MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%LOVE & CARE MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%LOVE & CARE MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%LOVE & CARE MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%LOVE & CARE MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
CA
MO
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 58 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

58 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
24

Total granted

$1.3M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+93%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Love & Care Ministries
    6× · 2019–2024 · $90k · revenue +49%
  • HP
    HATIKVA PROJECT US INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $55k · revenue +57%
  • HH
    HENDRICK HOME FOR CHILDREN
    6× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • LI
    LIFENETS INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BC
    BIG COUNTRY FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • BC
    BIG COUNTRY FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
2
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
3
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
4
Abilene Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The purpose of the Organization is to provide knowledge and understanding of economics, matters of public concern, finance, education and training, and problems of minority groups therby promoting the economy and quality of life in Abilene…

—
5
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
6
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
7
Presbyterian Medical Care Mission

Operate a non-profit medical clinic exclusively for charitable purposes to provide medical health services to uninsured and low income adults in the Abilene area.

—
8
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
9
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
10
Good Samaritan Foundation of Texas Inc

Good Samaritan Foundation (GSF) is a fundraising and grant-making organization dedicated solely to Texas nursing. Its mission is to increase the number of nurses dedicated to clinical care and to improve the quality of nurse education and…

Education
11
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
12
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Abilene; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
34/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BELTWAY BAPTIST CHURCH: $207,335 · OtherBELTWAY BAPTIST CHURCHThe University of Texas at Austin: $99,000 · OtherThe University of Texas at AustinHENDRICK HOME FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 · OtherNOAH PROJECT INC: $48,000 · OtherLOVE CARE MINISTRIES: $45,000 · OtherWEST TEXAS REHAB CENTER: $34,000 · Other+65 more: $528,935 · Other+65 moreLove & Care Ministries: $90,000 · Human ServicesLove & Care…MEALS ON WHEELS: $17,500 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WH…Hendrick Hospice Care: $16,000 · Human ServicesHendrick Ho…Abilene Boys Ranch Inc: $13,500 · Human ServicesAbilene Boy…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE: $90,000 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATION: $12,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMitrata-Nepal Foundation for Children: $35,500 · Youth DevelopmentABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentHATIKVA PROJECT US INC: $55,000 · International+1 more: $250 · InternationalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,000 · ReligionIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · ReligionCALEB GLOBAL: $5,000 · ReligionPregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc: $42,100 · Civil Rights
Other$1,012,270Human Services$149,000Philanthropy$107,500Youth Development$55,500International$55,250Religion$45,000Civil Rights$42,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLove & Care Ministries: $90,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE: $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHATIKVA PROJECT US INC: $55,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetHENDRICK HOME FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNOAH PROJECT INC: $48,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetPregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc: $42,100 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMitrata-Nepal Foundation for Children: $35,500 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDay Nursery of Abilene Inc: $31,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY: $20,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $17,500 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetHendrick Hospice Care: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAbilene Boys Ranch Inc: $13,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Abilene Inc: $11,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGROVER NELSON PARK ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetMidcoast Conservancy: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSerenity Foundation of Texas: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRONTIER TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGRACE MUSEUM INC: $7,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN PHARMACY ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Contemporary Arts: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCALEB GLOBAL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFood Bank of West Central Texas: $3,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Second Chance Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWYLIE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE REFUGE FOR DMST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOTOSI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTaylor County History Center: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Samaritan Resources Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Love & Care Ministries ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE ↗
  • Who funds HATIKVA PROJECT US INC ↗
  • Who funds HENDRICK HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NOAH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mitrata-Nepal Foundation for Children ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Day Nursery of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Hendrick Hospice Care ↗
  • Who funds BIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Boys Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds GROVER NELSON PARK ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Midcoast Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds Serenity Foundation of Texas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greathouse FoundationTX43.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greathouse Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Barber Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · The Legett Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · The Karakin Foundation · Directors Foundation · Moss Adamson Spalding Charities · Joe Davis Foundation - Defined · Jm Parker Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Massey Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Massey Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Massey Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Massey Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Massey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph