Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mary C Henry and Rajpal Sandhu Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$366kRecreation & Sports$240kPublic Benefit$141kHealth$71kFood & Nutrition$51kPhilanthropy$35kReligion$33kCivil Rights$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $99k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRANCH SERVICES$44,200
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$30,000
ICIVICS$25,000
ST DENIS PARISH$3,300
GURU GRANTH SAHIB FOUNDATION$3,000
HARVARD COLLEGE$3,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL$2,000
WOODSIDE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,500
SACRED HEART SCHOOLS ANNUAL FUND$1,500
ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$1,500
CALIFORNIA HUMANITIES$1,000
WANDA WOMEN AND ALLIES$1,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$750
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$750
GLOBAL RESEARCH AND CONSULTING$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY: $2k → 12%ASCRS FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%WANDA WOMEN AND ALLIES: $1k → 8%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$929k · 22 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
22

Total granted

$929k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+18%

Still filing today

41%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +41%
  • II
    ICIVICS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $141k · revenue +217%
  • WH
    WOODSIDE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $72k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
  • PV
    PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
12
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foothill-Deanza Community Colleges Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wanda Women and Allies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
20/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SACRED HEART SCHOOLS ANNUAL FUND: $201,356 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ANNUAL FUNDSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $51,250 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKBRANCH SERVICES: $49,200 · OtherBRANCH SERVICESHARVARD COLLEGE: $29,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGEYALE UNIVERSITY: $25,125 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYST DENIS PARISH: $18,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · Other+18 more: $52,781 · Other+18 moreNorthwestern University: $239,713 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern UniversityICIVICS INC: $141,000 · EducationICIVICS INCWOODSIDE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $71,750 · EducationWOODSIDE HIGH SCHOOL FOUND…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $8,500 · Education+6 more: $11,000 · EducationTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $32,000 · PhilanthropyFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $3,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $1,000 · HealthVista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $500 · HealthLOVE LIGHT AND MELODY: $2,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesMENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesWanda Women and Allies: $1,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $5,750 · Youth DevelopmentThe Guardsmen: $500 · Youth Development
Other$443,112Recreation & Sports$239,713Education$232,250Philanthropy$42,000Health$10,500Human Services$6,500Youth Development$6,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $239,713 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetICIVICS INC: $141,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWOODSIDE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $71,750 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $5,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Center: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE LIGHT AND MELODY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSIDE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWanda Women and Allies: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROOM TO READ: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPets In Need: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Guardsmen: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDERNESS ARTS AND LITERACY COLLABORATIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODSIDE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BATTERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds BUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Francis Center ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HUMANITIES ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA24.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mary C Henry and Rajpal Sandhu Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mary C Henry and Rajpal Sandhu Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Icivics Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary C Henry and Rajpal Sandhu’s filings →

More from the funding graph