Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Martin Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$247kEnvironment$162kReligion$63kArts & Culture$56kInternational$44kAnimals$24kFood & Nutrition$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k64 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APPLETREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION INC$25,000
TRINITY COLLEGE$5,000
TRINITY COLLEGE$5,000
SIXTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST WASHINGTON DC$3,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$2,500
CENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC$2,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$2,000
LITTLE FALLS WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC$2,000
YELLOWSTONE FOREVER$2,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,000
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$1,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC$1,000
CEDARS CAMPS$1,000
A WIDER CIRCLE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILIES FIRST INC: $100 → 13%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1k → 9%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $1k → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $1k → 8%SMYA INC: $1k → 14%SEXUAL MINORITY YOUTH ASSISTANCE LEAGUE: $1k → 14%KIND TO KIDS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%KIND TO KIDS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%GREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC: $2k → 14%GREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC: $1k → 14%GREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC: $1k → 14%GREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC: $1k → 14%CAPITAL PRIDE ALLIANCE INCORPORATED: $500 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC: $500 → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
KS
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Martin Family Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Martin Family Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$681k · 105 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

105 repeat relationships: 57 still active in FY2025, 48 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

105
40

Total granted

$681k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+18%

Still filing today

89%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    APPLETREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION
    3× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +59%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +156%
  • LF
    LITTLE FALLS WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +442%

Funded once

  • CS
    CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -66%
  • PB
    POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
3
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
4
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
7
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
8
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
9
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
10
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
11
United States Endowment for Forestry

The endowment works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative, and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation's working forests and forest reliant communities.

Environment
12
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environment America Research and Policy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nighthawks Youth Hockey Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
127/129
Grantees still filing
89/129
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $48,500 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYSIXTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST WASHINGTON DC: $27,000 · OtherSIXTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST WASHINGTON …THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $17,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST REHOBOTH BEACH: $15,400 · Other+74 more: $185,197 · Other+74 moreFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $55,000 · EducationFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGETRINITY COLLEGE: $46,500 · EducationTRINITY COLLEGEAPPLETREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION: $39,000 · EducationAPPLETREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCAT…UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN …+13 more: $37,425 · Education+13 moreLITTLE FALLS WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC: $18,000 · EnvironmentLITTLE FALLS WATER…YELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $11,500 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVE…CENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC: $11,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR THE INL…CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTER…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES …CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOU…OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $7,500 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCYENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $6,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFE…CERES INC: $6,500 · EnvironmentCERES INCEARTHJUSTICE: $6,000 · EnvironmentNature Forward: $5,000 · Environment+13 more: $18,600 · Environment+13 moreWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $14,200 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $10,000 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $7,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $7,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,500 · InternationalRAZOM INC: $4,000 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $2,500 · InternationalWASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $12,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureMPT FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 · Arts & CultureDC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAM: $5,000 · Arts & CultureEAST LANSING INFO: $4,000 · Arts & CultureMARYSVILLE UP DEPOT PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureUnicorn Riot: $2,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $1,600 · Arts & CultureREHOBOTH ART LEAGUE INC: $1,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · AnimalsMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4,500 · AnimalsTune In To Nature org: $4,000 · AnimalsPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 · AnimalsCheetah Conservation Fund: $1,000 · AnimalsMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · AnimalsDELAWARE HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $800 · Animals+2 more: $1,000 · AnimalsCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $13,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $1,600 · Food & Nutrition
Other$293,097Education$197,925Environment$120,600International$51,200Arts & Culture$43,200Animals$19,300Food & Nutrition$18,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $55,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $46,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAPPLETREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION: $39,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE FALLS WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC: $18,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $14,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $11,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLynn House of Potomac Valley Inc: $9,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOYSTER RECOVERY PARTNERSHIP INC: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREHOBOTH BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $7,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cedars Camps Inc: $6,575 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCERES INC: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $6,225 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $5,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN SCIENCE MEDIA COMMITTEE OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON: $5,700 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetMPT FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAM: $5,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNature Forward: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC: $4,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWashington Episcopal Day School Inc: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,200 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTune In To Nature org: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds APPLETREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE FALLS WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Lynn House of Potomac Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OYSTER RECOVERY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds REHOBOTH BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Cedars Camps Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CERES INC ↗
  • Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MEDIA COMMITTEE OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds MPT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC38× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Nora Roberts Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Posner-Wallace Foundation · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · The Kay Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Martin Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Martin Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Kind to Kids Foundation: 69% of income from government
  • Rehoboth Beach Volunteer Fire Company Inc: 64% of income from government
  • Center for the Inland Bays Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Nature Forward: 32% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Delaware Community Foundation Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Rehoboth Art League Inc: 8% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Oyster Recovery Partnership Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Salisbury University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Local Journalism Initiative Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Martin Family Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Martin Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph