Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Marks Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$56kHealth$56kPhilanthropy$48kArts & Culture$29kCommunity Improvement$25kReligion$16kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$527
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AKRON MARATHON CORPORATION$2,000
COMUNALE FOUNDATION$1,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$250
SIERRA CLUB$250
SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BATTERED WOMENS SHELTER: $1k → 13%AKRON BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $200 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$187k · 23 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
69

Total granted

$187k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

26%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +82%
  • AS
    AKRON SOUL TRAIN
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • A
    ARTSNOW
    2× · 2018–2022 · $700 · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • LF
    LIEBERTH FUND AT ACF
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • LF
    LISBETH FUND AT AFC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • PP
    PORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Akron Zoological Park

We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.

Animals
3
Akron Development Corporation

The akron development corporation was organized to support economic development initiatives in the city of akron, particularly through the former akron global business accelerator and to secure state of ohio funding for technology-based…

Community Improvement
4
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
5
The Akron Marathon Charitable Corporation

At the akron marathon charitable corporation, our mission is to inspire healthier lives and a stronger community through our three-part race series and events. we are committed to creating dynamic, welcoming race experiences that promote…

Philanthropy
6
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
7
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
8
Greater Akron Chamber

To promote business in the tri-county area

—
9
Akron Bar Association

To enhance the quality of law and justice through community service and to maintain the integrity of the profession.

—
10
Akron Community Service Center & Urban League Inc

To improve the quality of life for the citizens of summit county, particularly african americans, by advocating and facilitating programs that are economically and educationally transformational, impacting their lives and the lives of…

Human Services
11
Akron Roundtable

Akron roundtable brings speakers to akron who inform, educate and stimulate listeners on topics of importance to the region, the country and the world.

—
12
Ohio Life Sciences Association

Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Akron Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
14/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $37,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF AKRONCURATED STOREFRONT: $22,000 · OtherCURATED STOREFRONTAKRON MARATHON CORPORATION: $17,250 · OtherAKRON MARATHON CORPORATIONAKRON CIVIC THEATRE: $16,300 · OtherAKRON CIVIC THEATRETEMPLE ISRAEL: $15,300 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELJEWISH CENTER BOARD OF AKRON: $9,100 · Other+66 more: $64,728 · Other+66 moreSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $31,525 · HealthSTEWART'S CARING P…PORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $5,000 · HealthPORTAGE PATH BEHAV…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · HealthJ&F Memorial Fund Inc: $1,750 · Health+2 more: $1,025 · HealthAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,925 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY BOARD OF AKRON: $2,600 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyAKRON SOUL TRAIN: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAkron History Center: $2,500 · Arts & CultureAKRON ART MUSEUM: $1,500 · Arts & CultureSUMMIT ARTSPACE: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSTAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC: $800 · Arts & CultureARTSNOW: $700 · Arts & CultureOHIO NEWS MEDIA FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationLaw and Leadership Institute LLC: $500 · EducationLEADERSHIP AKRON: $250 · EducationPELOTONIA: $200 · EducationHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $1,200 · Human ServicesRUNNING2BWELL: $500 · Recreation & SportsWEST AKRON BASEBALL LEAGUE: $400 · Recreation & Sports
Other$182,178Health$41,300Philanthropy$12,775Arts & Culture$11,500Education$1,450Human Services$1,200Recreation & Sports$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $31,525 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,925 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON SOUL TRAIN: $5,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetPORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY BOARD OF AKRON: $2,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJ&F Memorial Fund Inc: $1,750 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAKRON ART MUSEUM: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT ARTSPACE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARSON STRONG FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTSNOW: $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT METRO PARKS FOUNDATION: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUNNING2BWELL: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO NEWS MEDIA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLaw and Leadership Institute LLC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRMH OF AKRONINC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP AKRON: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUECOATS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
  • Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AKRON SOUL TRAIN ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY BOARD OF AKRON ↗
  • Who funds Akron History Center ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds J&F Memorial Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds AKRON ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT ARTSPACE ↗
  • Who funds THE CARSON STRONG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSNOW ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehner Family FoundationOH36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehner Family Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Gar Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Synthomer Foundation Inc · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · The Welty Family Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marks Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marks Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marks Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Marks Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marks Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph